Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, and Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, The University of Sydney at Concord, Sydney NSW 2139, Australia.
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):849-58. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1477-x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
In the present prospective controlled observational study, we investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures. Compared to standard care, targeted identification, and management significantly reduced the risk of refracture by more than 80%.
The risk of refracture following an incident osteoporotic fracture is high. Despite the availability of treatments that reduce refracture and mortality rates, most patients with minimal trauma fracture (MTF) are not managed appropriately. The present prospective controlled observational study investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates and time to refracture in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures.
Patients presenting with a non-vertebral MTF were actively identified and offered referral to a dedicated intervention program. Patients attending the clinic underwent a standardized set of investigations, were treated as indicated and reviewed at 12-monthly intervals ('MTF group'). Patients who elected to follow-up with their primary care physician were assigned to the concurrent control group.
Groups were balanced for baseline anthropometric, socio-economic, and clinical risk factors. Over 4 years, 10 out of 246 patients (4.1%) in the MTF group and 31 of 157 patients (19.7%) in the control group suffered a new fracture, with a median time to refracture of 26 and 16 months, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to the intervention group, the risk of refracture was increased by 5.3-fold in the control group (95% CI: 2.8-12.2, p < 0.01), and remained elevated (HR 5.63, 95%CI 2.73-11.6, p < 0.01) after adjustment for other significant predictors of refracture such as age and body weight.
In patients presenting with a minimal trauma non-vertebral fracture, active identification and management significantly reduces the risk of refracture (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12606000108516).
本前瞻性对照观察研究旨在探讨针对近期骨质疏松性骨折患者的综合干预方案对 4 年再骨折率的影响。与标准护理相比,目标明确的识别和管理可使再骨折风险降低 80%以上。
发生骨质疏松性骨折后再次骨折的风险较高。尽管有治疗方法可以降低再骨折和死亡率,但大多数轻微创伤性骨折(MTF)患者的治疗并不恰当。本前瞻性对照观察研究旨在探讨综合干预方案对近期骨质疏松性骨折患者 4 年再骨折率和再骨折时间的影响。
对出现非椎体 MTF 的患者进行主动识别,并提供转介至专门干预计划的机会。就诊于诊所的患者接受了一套标准化的检查,根据需要进行治疗,并每 12 个月进行一次复查(“MTF 组”)。选择接受初级保健医生随访的患者被分配到同期对照组。
两组在基线人体测量、社会经济和临床危险因素方面平衡。在 4 年期间,MTF 组的 246 例患者中有 10 例(4.1%)和对照组的 157 例患者中有 31 例(19.7%)发生新骨折,再骨折的中位时间分别为 26 个月和 16 个月(p<0.01)。与干预组相比,对照组的再骨折风险增加了 5.3 倍(95%CI:2.8-12.2,p<0.01),并且在调整年龄和体重等其他再骨折的重要预测因素后,风险仍然升高(HR 5.63,95%CI 2.73-11.6,p<0.01)。
在出现轻微创伤性非椎体骨折的患者中,主动识别和管理可显著降低再骨折风险(澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册 ACTRN 12606000108516)。