Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步化治疗在需要正性肌力药物治疗的终末期心力衰竭患者中的作用。

Role of cardiac resynchronization in end-stage heart failure patients requiring inotrope therapy.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2010 Dec;16(12):931-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.07.253.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes among inotrope-treated heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have not been well characterized, particularly in those requiring intravenous inotropes at the time of implant.

METHODS

We analyzed 759 consecutive CRT-defibrillator recipients who were categorized as never on inotropes (NI; n = 585), weaned from inotropes before implant (PI; n = 124), or on inotropes at implant (II; n = 50). Survival free from heart transplant or ventricular assist device and overall survival were compared using the Social Security Death Index. A patient cohort who underwent unsuccessful CRT implantation and received a standard defibrillator (SD; n = 94) comprised a comparison group. Propensity score analysis was used to control for intergroup baseline differences.

RESULTS

Compared with the other cohorts, II patients had more comorbidities. Both survival endpoints differed significantly (P < .001) among the 4 cohorts; II patients demonstrated shorter survival than NI patients, with the PI and SD groups having intermediate survival. After adjusting for propensity scores, overall differences and patterns in survival endpoints persisted (P < .01), but the only statistically significant pairwise difference was overall survival between the NI and II groups at 12 months (hazard ratio 2.95, 95% confidence interval 1.05-8.35). CRT recipients ever on inotropes (PI and II) and SD patients ever requiring inotropes (n = 17) experienced similar survival endpoints. Among II patients, predictors of hospital discharge free from inotropes after CRT included male gender, older age, and ability to tolerate β-blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Inotrope-dependent HF patients show significantly worse survival despite CRT than inotrope-naïve patients, in part because of more comorbid conditions at baseline. CRT may not provide a survival advantage over a standard defibrillator among patients who have received inotropes before CRT. Weaning from inotropes and initiating neurohormonal antagonists before CRT should be an important goal among inotrope-dependent HF patients.

摘要

背景

接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的正性肌力药物治疗心力衰竭(HF)患者的结局尚未得到很好的描述,尤其是在植入时需要静脉内正性肌力药物的患者中。

方法

我们分析了 759 例连续的 CRT 除颤器接受者,他们分为从未使用过正性肌力药物(NI;n=585)、在植入前脱机(PI;n=124)或在植入时使用正性肌力药物(II;n=50)。使用社会安全死亡索引比较无心脏移植或心室辅助装置的生存和总体生存。一个不成功的 CRT 植入并接受标准除颤器(SD;n=94)的患者队列构成了对照组。使用倾向评分分析来控制组间基线差异。

结果

与其他队列相比,II 组患者合并症更多。四个队列之间的两个生存终点均有显著差异(P<0.001);与 NI 组相比,II 组患者的生存时间更短,PI 和 SD 组患者的生存时间居中。调整倾向评分后,总体差异和生存终点模式仍然存在(P<0.01),但仅在 NI 和 II 组之间 12 个月时的总体生存存在统计学意义上的显著差异(风险比 2.95,95%置信区间 1.05-8.35)。曾经使用过正性肌力药物的 CRT 接受者(PI 和 II)和曾经需要使用正性肌力药物的 SD 患者(n=17)经历了相似的生存终点。在 II 组患者中,CRT 后无正性肌力药物出院的预测因素包括男性、年龄较大和能够耐受β受体阻滞剂。

结论

尽管 CRT,但与正性肌力药物治疗的 HF 患者相比,HF 患者的生存率明显较差,部分原因是基线时合并症更多。对于在 CRT 之前接受过正性肌力药物治疗的患者,CRT 可能不会提供比标准除颤器更高的生存优势。在 CRT 之前脱机并开始使用神经激素拮抗剂应该是正性肌力药物依赖 HF 患者的一个重要目标。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Cardiac resynchronization induces favorable neurohumoral changes.心脏再同步化可诱导有益的神经体液变化。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;28(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09508.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验