Weiner Joshua, Widman Shannon, Golek Zygmunt, Tranquilli Maryann, Elefteriades John A
Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
J Card Surg. 2011 Jan;26(1):76-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01162.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
Questions exist concerning the safety of bovine serum albumin-glutaraldehyde (BSAG) glue in thoracic aortic surgery, vis-à-vis embolization and pseudoaneurysm formation. We examined clinical experience with BSAG glue to determine if such problems were detected.
We studied 99 consecutive patients (25 female and 74 male, age range 27 to 86 years) in whom BSAG glue or similar product was used for reinforcement of thoracic aortic suture lines (n = 87 BSAG glue, 12 GRF [French] glue). BSAG glue was used selectively and sparingly for acute aortic dissection or tissue fragility. Cases included 81 ascending/arch procedures, 15 descending/thoracoabdominal procedures, and 3 combined. Clinical outcome and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 90 months (mean: 15.1 months). We also examined the records of 78 controls in which BSAG glue was not used. The two groups were statistically similar except for rate of aneurysm versus dissection and percentage of emergent surgery.
Perioperative survival was 95/99 (96.0%). Six patients (6.0%) required reexploration for bleeding. There were five early postoperative neurological events and no late strokes or peripheral embolic events. CT scan follow-up identified two pseudoansuerysms, both not perianastomic, which were likely unrelated to BSAG glue use. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of pseudoaneurysms between the two groups.
Isolated problems associated with BSAG glue have been reported. In this relatively large experience, we identified no obvious problems directly related to judicious use of BSAG glue. BSAG glue appears a safe and effective adjunct in thoracic aortic surgery.
关于牛血清白蛋白-戊二醛(BSAG)胶水在胸主动脉手术中栓塞和假性动脉瘤形成方面的安全性存在疑问。我们研究了使用BSAG胶水的临床经验,以确定是否检测到此类问题。
我们研究了99例连续患者(25例女性和74例男性,年龄范围27至86岁),这些患者使用BSAG胶水或类似产品加固胸主动脉缝合线(87例使用BSAG胶水,12例使用GRF[法国]胶水)。BSAG胶水选择性且少量用于急性主动脉夹层或组织脆弱的情况。病例包括81例升主动脉/主动脉弓手术、15例降主动脉/胸腹主动脉手术和3例联合手术。回顾了临床结果和术后计算机断层扫描(CT)。随访时间为1至90个月(平均:15.1个月)。我们还检查了78例未使用BSAG胶水的对照记录。除动脉瘤与夹层发生率以及急诊手术百分比外,两组在统计学上相似。
围手术期生存率为95/99(96.0%)。6例患者(6.0%)因出血需要再次手术探查。术后早期有5例神经系统事件,无晚期中风或外周栓塞事件。CT扫描随访发现2例假性动脉瘤,均非吻合口周围,可能与使用BSAG胶水无关。两组之间假性动脉瘤的发生率无统计学显著差异。
已报道与BSAG胶水相关的个别问题。在这一相对较大规模的经验中,我们未发现与合理使用BSAG胶水直接相关的明显问题。BSAG胶水似乎是胸主动脉手术中一种安全有效的辅助材料。