Division of Welfare and Health Promotion, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Br J Nutr. 2011 Apr;105(8):1258-64. doi: 10.1017/S000711451000485X. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
Findings on dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) as risk factors for type 2 diabetes have been controversial. We examined the associations of dietary GI and GL and the associations of substitution of lower-GI carbohydrates for higher-GI carbohydrates with diabetes risk in a cohort of Finnish men. The cohort consisted of 25 943 male smokers aged 50-69 years. Diet was assessed, at baseline, using a validated diet history questionnaire. During a 12-year follow-up, 1098 incident diabetes cases were identified from a national register. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to estimate the risk of diabetes, and multivariate nutrient density models were used to examine the effects of substitution of different carbohydrates. Dietary GI and GL were not associated with diabetes risk; multivariate relative risk (RR) for highest v. lowest quintile for GI was 0·87 (95 % CI 0·71, 1·07) and for GL 0·88 (95 % CI 0·65, 1·17). Substitution of medium-GI carbohydrates for high-GI carbohydrates was inversely associated with diabetes risk (multivariate RR for highest v. lowest quintile 0·75, 95 % CI 0·59, 0·96), but substitution of low-GI carbohydrates for medium- or high-GI carbohydrates was not associated with the risk. In conclusion, dietary GI and GL were not associated with diabetes risk, and substitutions of lower-GI carbohydrates for higher-GI carbohydrates were not consistently associated with a lower diabetes risk. The associations of dietary GI and GL with diabetes risk should be interpreted by considering nutritional correlates, as foods may have different properties that affect risk.
关于饮食血糖指数 (GI) 和血糖负荷 (GL) 作为 2 型糖尿病风险因素的研究结果一直存在争议。我们在芬兰男性队列中研究了饮食 GI 和 GL 与糖尿病风险的关联,以及用低 GI 碳水化合物替代高 GI 碳水化合物与糖尿病风险的关联。该队列由 25943 名年龄在 50-69 岁的男性吸烟者组成。在基线时,使用经过验证的饮食史问卷评估饮食情况。在 12 年的随访期间,从国家登记处确定了 1098 例新发糖尿病病例。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计糖尿病风险,使用多元营养素密度模型研究不同碳水化合物替代的影响。饮食 GI 和 GL 与糖尿病风险无关;GI 最高五分位与最低五分位的多变量相对风险 (RR) 为 0.87(95%CI 0.71,1.07),GL 为 0.88(95%CI 0.65,1.17)。用中 GI 碳水化合物替代高 GI 碳水化合物与糖尿病风险呈负相关(最高五分位与最低五分位的多变量 RR 为 0.75,95%CI 0.59,0.96),但用低 GI 碳水化合物替代中 GI 或高 GI 碳水化合物与风险无关。总之,饮食 GI 和 GL 与糖尿病风险无关,用低 GI 碳水化合物替代高 GI 碳水化合物与较低的糖尿病风险并不一致相关。考虑到营养相关性,应通过考虑饮食 GI 和 GL 与糖尿病风险的关联来解释食品可能具有不同的特性会影响风险。