• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织(WHO)空腹血糖受损标准作为发展糖尿病高风险患者行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的指征是否合适?

Is using WHO criteria for impaired fasting glycaemia appropriate as an indication for OGTT in patients at high risk of developing diabetes?

机构信息

Specialist Registrar in Clinical Chemistry and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1793-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02383.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02383.x
PMID:21117282
Abstract

AIM

Impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) is an indication for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). World health organisation and International Diabetes Federation define IFG as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of 6.1–6.9 mmol/l. However, American Diabetes Association still recommends a range of 5.6–6.9 mmol/l as IFG.We performed an audit to assess the outcome of OGTT at various cut offs of FPG levels in patients at high risk of developing diabetes.

METHODS

Laboratory dataon OGTT performed over a period of 1 year in a district general hospital were collected. Patients with FPG levels between 5.6 and 6.9 mmol/l were selected and the outcome was analysed.

RESULTS

Our audit shows that in patients with FPG levels of 5.6–6.0 mmol/l, 19% had diabetes and 43% had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of subjects with abnormal OGTT in our study is much higher than that of Decode study [Diabetologica, 42 (1999) 647] (7% diabetes and 29% IGT). However, Decode study had included general population whereas our data were collected from subjects who are at high risk of developing diabetes. We conclude that in these subjects the lower cut off level of 5.6 mmol/l for FPG should be used as an indication for OGTT.

摘要

目的

空腹血糖受损(IFG)是口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的指征。世界卫生组织和国际糖尿病联合会将 IFG 定义为空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)水平为 6.1-6.9mmol/L。然而,美国糖尿病协会仍建议将 5.6-6.9mmol/L 的范围作为 IFG。我们进行了一项审计,以评估在高糖尿病风险患者中,各种 FPG 水平截断值下 OGTT 的结果。

方法

在一家地区综合医院,收集了在 1 年内进行的 OGTT 的实验室数据。选择 FPG 水平在 5.6-6.9mmol/L 之间的患者,并对结果进行分析。

结果

我们的审计显示,在 FPG 水平为 5.6-6.0mmol/L 的患者中,19%患有糖尿病,43%患有糖耐量受损(IGT)。

结论

与 Decode 研究[Diabetologia,42(1999)647](7%糖尿病和 29%IGT)相比,我们研究中异常 OGTT 的受试者比例要高得多。然而,Decode 研究纳入了普通人群,而我们的数据是从有发展为糖尿病高风险的受试者中收集的。我们的结论是,在这些受试者中,FPG 的较低截断值 5.6mmol/L 应作为 OGTT 的指征。

相似文献

1
Is using WHO criteria for impaired fasting glycaemia appropriate as an indication for OGTT in patients at high risk of developing diabetes?使用世界卫生组织(WHO)空腹血糖受损标准作为发展糖尿病高风险患者行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的指征是否合适?
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1793-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02383.x.
2
Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病分类与诊断标准委员会报告。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Jan;55(1):65-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00365-5.
3
Comparison of The World Health Organization (WHO) two-step strategy and OGTT for diabetes mellitus screening.世界卫生组织(WHO)两步法策略与口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)用于糖尿病筛查的比较。
Acta Med Indones. 2004 Jan-Mar;36(1):3-7.
4
[Cut-off points of fasting fingertip capillary blood glucose for detecting both undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes].用于检测未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期的空腹指尖毛细血管血糖切点
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;31(10):1174-8.
5
Impaired glucose regulation in adults in Jamaica: who should have the oral glucose tolerance test?牙买加成年人的血糖调节受损:谁应该进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验?
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 Jul;16(1):35-42. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000700005.
6
Screening for diabetes mellitus--a two-step approach in individuals with impaired fasting glucose improves detection of those at risk of complications.糖尿病筛查——对空腹血糖受损个体采用两步法可提高对有并发症风险者的检测率。
Diabet Med. 2000 Nov;17(11):771-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00382.x.
7
Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance: 1997 criteria by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (ADA), 1998 WHO consultation criteria, and 1985 WHO criteria. World Health Organization.糖尿病及其他类型糖耐量异常的诊断标准:糖尿病诊断与分类专家委员会(美国糖尿病协会)1997年标准、世界卫生组织1998年咨询标准以及世界卫生组织1985年标准。世界卫生组织
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999 Apr;44(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00008-x.
8
Does HbA1C predict isolated impaired fasting glycaemia in the oral glucose tolerance test in subjects with impaired fasting glycaemia?糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)能否预测空腹血糖受损受试者口服葡萄糖耐量试验中的单纯空腹血糖受损情况?
Ann Clin Biochem. 2008 Jul;45(Pt 4):418-20. doi: 10.1258/acb.2008.008017.
9
[Impact of lowering the cut-point for impaired fasting glucose on the distribution of impaired glucose regulation subcategories in Chinese adult population].[降低空腹血糖受损切点对中国成年人群糖调节异常亚类分布的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Nov 2;84(21):1773-6.
10
Use of the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for diabetes in a Hong Kong Chinese population.1997年美国糖尿病协会糖尿病诊断标准在香港华人中的应用。
Diabetes Care. 1998 Dec;21(12):2094-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.12.2094.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and associated risk factors among Malaysian adult population: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019.马来西亚成年人群中空腹血糖受损的患病率及相关危险因素:2019年全国健康与发病率调查(NHMS)的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0320993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320993. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of prior exercise on glycemic responses following carbohydrate inges on in individuals with type 2 diabetes.先前运动对2型糖尿病患者碳水化合物摄入后血糖反应的影响。
J Clin Transl Res. 2015 Jul 17;1(1):22-30. eCollection 2015 Jul 20.