Emerson Eric, Shahtahmasebi Said, Lancaster Gillian, Berridge Damon
Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Dec;35(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.518562.
Little is known about child disability and dynamic aspects of poverty.
Analysis of data collected over a 12-month period for families (a) supporting a child with intellectual disability (n = 370), (b) supporting a child with other disability (n = 1,418), and (c) supporting a child with no disability (n = 7,215).
When compared to families not supporting a child with disability, families supporting a child with intellectual disability were (a) more likely to be poor, (b) more likely to become poor, (c) less likely to escape from being poor. Half of poverty transitions were associated with identifiable potential trigger events.
There were few differences between families supporting or not supporting a child with disability with regard to either levels of exposure to potential trigger events or to the strength of the association between exposure and poverty transitions.
关于儿童残疾与贫困的动态方面知之甚少。
对在12个月期间收集的家庭数据进行分析,这些家庭包括:(a) 抚养一名智障儿童的家庭(n = 370),(b) 抚养一名患有其他残疾儿童的家庭(n = 1418),以及(c) 抚养一名无残疾儿童的家庭(n = 7215)。
与不抚养残疾儿童的家庭相比,抚养智障儿童的家庭:(a) 更有可能贫困,(b) 更有可能陷入贫困,(c) 摆脱贫困的可能性更小。一半的贫困转变与可识别的潜在触发事件有关。
在接触潜在触发事件的程度或接触与贫困转变之间关联的强度方面,抚养或不抚养残疾儿童的家庭之间几乎没有差异。