Suppr超能文献

“精神病连续统”:缺乏科学证据且不切临床实际。

The 'continuum of psychosis': scientifically unproven and clinically impractical.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;197(6):423-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072827.

Abstract

The limitations of current diagnostic categories are well recognised but their rationale, advantages and utility are often ignored. The scientific support for a 'continuum of psychosis' is limited, and the examination of whether categories, a continuum or more than one continua, and alternatives such as subtypes or hybrid models, best account for the distributions of symptoms in populations has simply not been done. There is a lack of discussion, let alone consensus, about the critical aspects of psychosis to measure, the best ways to quantify those and how these would be applied in clinical practice. Systematic studies are needed to evaluate which of a range of plausible approaches to the classification of psychosis is most useful before change could be justified.

摘要

当前诊断类别的局限性是众所周知的,但它们的原理、优势和实用性往往被忽视。“精神病连续谱”的科学依据有限,而且尚未对类别、连续谱还是多个连续谱,以及替代方案(如亚型或混合模型)是否能更好地解释人群中症状的分布进行研究。关于需要测量的精神病关键方面、量化这些方面的最佳方法以及如何将这些方法应用于临床实践,几乎没有讨论,更不用说达成共识了。在进行更改之前,需要进行系统研究,以评估精神病分类的一系列可行方法中哪种最有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验