• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知疗法与边缘型人格障碍的常规治疗:前瞻性 6 年随访。

Cognitive therapy v. usual treatment for borderline personality disorder: prospective 6-year follow-up.

机构信息

Centre for Population and HealthSciences, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;197(6):456-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074286.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074286
PMID:21119151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Longer-term follow-up of patients with borderline personality disorder have found favourable clinical outcomes, with long-term reduction in symptoms and diagnosis.

AIMS

We examined the 6-year outcome of patients with borderline personality disorder who were randomised to 1 year of cognitive-behavioural therapy for personality disorders (CBT-PD) or treatment as usual (TAU) in the BOSCOT trial, in three centres across the UK (trial registration: ISRCTN86177428).

METHOD

In total, 106 participants met criteria for borderline personality disorder in the original trial. Patients were interviewed at follow-up by research assistants masked to the patient's original treatment group, CBT-PD or TAU, using the same measures as in the original randomised trial. Statistical analyses of data for the group as a whole are based on generalised linear models with repeated measures analysis of variance type models to examine group differences.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were obtained for 82% of patients at 6 years. Over half the patients meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder at entry into the study no longer did so 6 years later. The gains of CBT-PD over TAU in reduction of suicidal behaviour seen after 1-year follow-up were maintained. Length of hospitalisation and cost of services were lower in the CBT-PD group compared with the TAU group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of CBT-PD did not demonstrate a statistically significant cost-effective advantage, the findings indicate the potential for continued long-term cost-offsets that accrue following the initial provision of 1 year of CBT-PD. However, the quality of life and affective disturbance remained poor.

摘要

背景

对边缘型人格障碍患者进行的长期随访发现,其临床结局良好,症状和诊断长期减轻。

目的

我们在英国三个中心的 BOSCOT 试验中,检查了随机分配到 1 年认知行为治疗人格障碍(CBT-PD)或常规治疗(TAU)的边缘型人格障碍患者的 6 年结局,这些患者符合原试验的标准。

方法

共有 106 名患者在原始试验中符合边缘型人格障碍标准。研究助理在随访时对患者进行访谈,他们对患者的原始治疗组、CBT-PD 或 TAU 一无所知,使用与原始随机试验相同的措施。对整个组进行数据分析采用的是广义线性模型,重复测量方差分析类型的模型来检验组间差异。

结果

在 6 年后,82%的患者获得了随访数据。超过一半在研究开始时符合边缘型人格障碍标准的患者,6 年后不再符合该标准。在 1 年随访后,CBT-PD 在减少自杀行为方面优于 TAU 的效果得到了维持。与 TAU 组相比,CBT-PD 组的住院时间和服务成本更低。

结论

尽管 CBT-PD 的使用没有显示出具有统计学意义的成本效益优势,但研究结果表明,在最初提供 1 年 CBT-PD 之后,可能会持续产生长期的成本节约。然而,生活质量和情感障碍仍然很差。

相似文献

1
Cognitive therapy v. usual treatment for borderline personality disorder: prospective 6-year follow-up.认知疗法与边缘型人格障碍的常规治疗:前瞻性 6 年随访。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;197(6):456-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074286.
2
The effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: results from the borderline personality disorder study of cognitive therapy (BOSCOT) trial.认知行为疗法对边缘型人格障碍的疗效:认知疗法边缘型人格障碍研究(BOSCOT)试验的结果
J Pers Disord. 2006 Oct;20(5):450-65. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.450.
3
Influence of therapist competence and quantity of cognitive behavioural therapy on suicidal behaviour and inpatient hospitalisation in a randomised controlled trial in borderline personality disorder: further analyses of treatment effects in the BOSCOT study.在一项针对边缘型人格障碍的随机对照试验中,治疗师的能力和认知行为疗法的数量对自杀行为和住院治疗的影响:BOSCOT 研究中治疗效果的进一步分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep;86(3):280-93. doi: 10.1111/papt.12004. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
4
Manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy in treating depression in advanced cancer: the CanTalk RCT.在晚期癌症中治疗抑郁的手册化认知行为疗法:CanTalk RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(19):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta23190.
5
Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up.针对边缘型人格障碍门诊患者的情绪可预测性与问题解决系统训练(STEPPS):一项随机对照试验及1年随访
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):468-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071079. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
6
Therapist telephone-delivered CBT and web-based CBT compared with treatment as usual in refractory irritable bowel syndrome: the ACTIB three-arm RCT.电话式认知行为疗法和基于网络的认知行为疗法联合常规治疗与常规治疗对照治疗难治性肠易激综合征的 ACTIB 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Apr;23(17):1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta23170.
7
Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder.辩证行为疗法与专家治疗对自杀行为和边缘性人格障碍的两年随机对照试验及随访
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.
8
The cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: results from the BOSCOT trial.边缘型人格障碍认知行为疗法的成本效益:BOSCOT试验结果
J Pers Disord. 2006 Oct;20(5):466-81. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.466.
9
Lamotrigine versus inert placebo in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation.拉莫三嗪与惰性安慰剂治疗边缘型人格障碍的疗效对比:一项随机对照试验及经济学评估的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 18;16:308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0823-x.
10
Lamotrigine for people with borderline personality disorder: a RCT.拉莫三嗪治疗边缘型人格障碍患者的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Apr;22(17):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta22170.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Experiences of Treatment for Men With Borderline Personality Disorder.系统评价治疗边缘型人格障碍男性的有效性和体验。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Jul-Aug;18(4):15579883241271894. doi: 10.1177/15579883241271894.
2
Patient perspectives on non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study.边缘型人格障碍患者对心理治疗无反应的看法:一项定性研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Apr 18;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00219-y.
3
Effectiveness of outpatient and community treatments for people with a diagnosis of 'personality disorder': systematic review and meta-analysis.
门诊和社区治疗对被诊断为“人格障碍”的人的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04483-0.
4
Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review.关于为有复杂情感需求的人群提供社区治疗的证据现状:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04171-z.
5
Iconic Therapy for the reduction of borderline personality disorder symptoms among suicidal youth: a preliminary study.标志性治疗对减少有自杀倾向的青年人群的边缘型人格障碍症状的初步研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03862-x.
6
Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.成人自伤的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.
7
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
8
Evaluation of a brief intervention within a stepped care whole of service model for personality disorder.一种基于阶梯式全服务模式的人格障碍简短干预的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2308-z.
9
The Cost-Effectiveness of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme in Severe Mental Illness: A Decision Analytical Model Using Routine Data.严重精神疾病中改善心理治疗途径(IAPT)项目的成本效益:使用常规数据的决策分析模型。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;55(5):873-883. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00390-z. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Does response to the STEPPS program differ by sex, age, or race in offenders with borderline personality disorder?对于边缘型人格障碍的罪犯,他们对 STEPPS 计划的反应是否因性别、年龄或种族而异?
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;87:134-137. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 23.