Palmer Stephen, Davidson Kate, Tyrer Peter, Gumley Andrew, Tata Philip, Norrie John, Murray Heather, Seivewright Helen
Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
J Pers Disord. 2006 Oct;20(5):466-81. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.466.
Borderline personality disorder places a significant burden on healthcare providers and other agencies. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy plus treatment as usual compared to treatment as usual alone for patients with borderline personality disorder. The economic analysis was conducted alongside a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. The costs of primary and secondary healthcare utilization, alongside the wider economic costs, were estimated from medical records and patient self-report. The primary outcome measure used was the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), assessed using EuroQol. On average, total costs per patient in the cognitive behavior therapy group were lower than patients receiving usual care alone (-689 pounds sterling), although this group also reported a lower quality of life (-0.11 QALYs). These differences were small and did not approach conventional levels of statistical significance. The use of cognitive therapy for borderline personality disorder does not appear to demonstrate any significant cost-effective advantage based on the results of this study.
边缘型人格障碍给医疗保健提供者和其他机构带来了沉重负担。本研究评估了认知行为疗法加常规治疗与单纯常规治疗相比,对边缘型人格障碍患者的成本效益。经济分析是与一项多中心随机对照试验同时进行的。通过病历和患者自我报告估算了初级和二级医疗保健利用成本以及更广泛的经济成本。使用的主要结局指标是质量调整生命年(QALY),采用欧洲五维度健康量表进行评估。平均而言,认知行为疗法组每位患者的总成本低于单纯接受常规护理的患者(低689英镑),尽管该组报告的生活质量也较低(低0.11个QALY)。这些差异很小,未达到传统的统计学显著性水平。基于本研究结果,使用认知疗法治疗边缘型人格障碍似乎并未显示出任何显著的成本效益优势。