University at Buffalo, Farber Hall G56, 3435 Main Street, Building #26, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 2010 Dec;31(4):461-77. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2010.32.
Few research studies on school violence policies use quantitative methods to evaluate the impact of policies on workplace violence. This study analyzed nine different written violence policies and their impact on work-related physical assault in educational settings. Data were from the Minnesota Educators' Study. This large, nested case control study included cases (n=372) who reported physical assaults within the last year, and controls (n=1116) who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, using directed acyclic graphs, estimated risk of assault. Results of the adjusted multivariate model suggested decreased risks of physical assault were associated with the presence of policies regarding how to report sexual harassment, verbal abuse, and threat (OR 0.53; 95 per cent CI: 0.30-0.95); assurance of confidential reporting of events (OR 0.67; 95 per cent CI: 0.44-1.04); and zero tolerance for violence (OR 0.70; 95 per cent CI: 0.47-1.04).
鲜有针对校园暴力政策的研究采用定量方法来评估政策对工作场所暴力的影响。本研究分析了九项不同的书面暴力政策及其对教育环境中与工作相关的人身攻击的影响。数据来自明尼苏达州教育者研究。这项大型嵌套病例对照研究包括在过去一年中报告人身攻击的病例(n=372)和未报告人身攻击的对照(n=1116)。使用有向无环图的多变量逻辑回归分析估计了攻击风险。调整后的多变量模型的结果表明,存在有关如何报告性骚扰、辱骂和威胁的政策(比值比 0.53;95%置信区间:0.30-0.95)、保证对事件进行保密报告(比值比 0.67;95%置信区间:0.44-1.04)和对暴力零容忍(比值比 0.70;95%置信区间:0.47-1.04)与人身攻击风险降低相关。