Augstein Petra, Vogt Lutz, Kohnert Klaus-Dieter, Heinke Peter, Salzsieder Eckhard
Institute of Diabetes Gerhardt Katsch Karlsburg, Karlsburg, Germany.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1532-9. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400631.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of personalized decision support (PDS) on metabolic control in people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
The German health insurance fund BKK TAUNUS offers to its insured people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease the possibility to participate in the Diabetiva® program, which includes PDS. Personalized decision support is generated by the expert system KADIS® using self-control data and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as its data source. The physician of the participating person receives the PDS once a year, decides about use or nonuse, and reports his/her decision in a questionnaire. Metabolic control of participants treated by use or nonuse of PDS for one year and receiving CGM twice was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); secondary outcomes were mean sensor glucose (MSG), glucose variability, and hypoglycemia.
A total of 323 subjects received CGM twice, 289 had complete data sets, 97% (280/289) were type 2 diabetes patients, and 74% (214/289) were treated using PDS, resulting in a decrease in HbA1c [7.10±1.06 to 6.73±0.82%; p<.01; change in HbA1ct0-t12 months -0.37 (95% confidence interval -0.46 to -0.28)] and MSG (7.7±1.6 versus 7.4±1.2 mmol/liter; p=.003) within one year. Glucose variability was also reduced, as indicated by lower high blood glucose index (p=.001), Glycemic Risk Assessment Diabetes Equation (p=.009), and time of hyper-glycemia (p=.003). Low blood glucose index and time spent in hypoglycemia were not affected. In contrast, nonuse of PDS (75/289) resulted in increased HbA1c (p<.001). Diabetiva outcome was strongly related to baseline HbA1c (HbA1ct0; p<.01) and use of PDS (p<.01). Acceptance of PDS was dependent on HbA1ct0 (p=.049).
Personalized decision support has potential to improve metabolic outcome in routine diabetes care.
本研究旨在评估个性化决策支持(PDS)对糖尿病合并心血管疾病患者代谢控制的影响。
德国健康保险基金BKK TAUNUS为其投保的糖尿病合并心血管疾病患者提供参与Diabetiva®项目的机会,该项目包括PDS。个性化决策支持由专家系统KADIS®利用自我控制数据和持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)作为数据源生成。参与患者的医生每年接收一次PDS,决定是否使用,并在问卷中报告其决定。在一项回顾性观察研究中,分析了使用或不使用PDS治疗一年且接受两次CGM的参与者的代谢控制情况。主要结局是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c);次要结局是平均传感器葡萄糖(MSG)、血糖变异性和低血糖。
共有323名受试者接受了两次CGM,289名有完整数据集,97%(280/289)为2型糖尿病患者,74%(214/289)使用PDS治疗,一年内HbA1c降低[从7.10±1.06%降至6.73±0.82%;p<0.01;HbA1c在0至12个月的变化为-0.37(95%置信区间为-0.46至-0.28)],MSG降低(7.7±1.6对7.4±1.2 mmol/升;p = 0.003)。血糖变异性也降低了,表现为高血糖指数降低(p = 0.001)、糖尿病血糖风险评估方程降低(p = 0.009)和高血糖时间降低(p = 0.003)。低血糖指数和低血糖持续时间未受影响。相比之下,不使用PDS(75/289)导致HbA1c升高(p<0.001)。Diabetiva结局与基线HbA1c(HbA1c0;p<0.01)和PDS的使用(p<0.01)密切相关。PDS的接受程度取决于HbA1c0(p = 0.049)。
个性化决策支持在常规糖尿病护理中具有改善代谢结局的潜力。