Suppr超能文献

啮齿动物前脑和突触后胆碱能标志物的定位:大鼠和小鼠的简要历史和比较。

Localization of pre- and postsynaptic cholinergic markers in rodent forebrain: a brief history and comparison of rat and mouse.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Centre for Behaviour and Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2011 Aug 10;221(2):356-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.051. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

Abstract

Rat and mouse models are widely used for studies in cognition and pathophysiology, among others. Here, we sought to determine to what extent these two model species differ for cholinergic and cholinoceptive features. For this purpose, we focused on cholinergic innervation patterns based on choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunostaining, and the expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) detected immunocytochemically. In this brief review we first place cholinergic and cholinoceptive markers in a historic perspective, and then provide an overview of recent publications on cholinergic studies and techniques to provide a literature survey of current research. Next, we compare mouse (C57Bl/J6) and rat (Wistar) cholinergic and cholinoceptive systems simultaneously stained, respectively, for ChAT (analyzed qualitatively) and mAChRs (analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively). In general, the topographic cholinergic innervation patterns of both rodent species are highly comparable, with only considerable (but region specific) differences in number of detectable cholinergic interneurons, which are more numerous in rat. In contrast, immunolabeling for mAChRs, detected by the monoclonal antibody M35, differs markedly in the forebrain between the two species. In mouse brain, basal levels of activated and/or internalized mAChRs (as a consequence of cholinergic neurotransmission) are significantly higher. This suggests a higher cholinergic tone in mouse than rat, and hence the animal model of choice may have consequences for cholinergic drug testing experiments.

摘要

大鼠和小鼠模型广泛应用于认知和病理生理学等领域的研究。在这里,我们试图确定这两种模型物种在胆碱能和胆碱能感受特征上有多大程度的不同。为此,我们专注于基于胆碱乙酰转移酶(ChAT)免疫染色的胆碱能神经支配模式,以及通过免疫细胞化学检测到的毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体(mAChR)的表达。在这篇简短的综述中,我们首先将胆碱能和胆碱能感受标志物置于历史背景下,然后概述最近关于胆碱能研究的出版物和技术,以提供当前研究的文献综述。接下来,我们分别比较了同时用 ChAT(定性分析)和 mAChR(定性和定量分析)染色的小鼠(C57Bl/J6)和大鼠(Wistar)的胆碱能和胆碱能感受系统。一般来说,这两种啮齿动物的拓扑胆碱能神经支配模式非常相似,只有可检测的胆碱能中间神经元的数量存在相当大的(但具有区域特异性)差异,大鼠中这些神经元的数量更多。相比之下,两种物种之间的 forebrain 中,M35 单克隆抗体检测到的 mAChR 免疫标记明显不同。在小鼠脑中,激活和/或内化的 mAChR(作为胆碱能神经传递的结果)的基础水平显著更高。这表明小鼠中的胆碱能张力高于大鼠,因此选择的动物模型可能会对胆碱能药物测试实验产生影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验