• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术可在超急性期进行,不会显著增加手术风险。

Rapid access carotid endarterectomy can be performed in the hyperacute period without a significant increase in procedural risks.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.10.017
PMID:21130006
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The highest risk of recurrent stroke after suffering a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is during the first 7-14 days. Contemporary guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should be performed within this time period, but there are concerns regarding (1) how this can be achieved logistically and (2) whether this policy is associated with a significant increase in procedural risks.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, consecutive study of delays to surgery and 30-day outcomes in recently symptomatic patients who underwent CEA between 1 October 2008 and 15 June 2010 after the creation of a rapid access TIA service.

RESULTS

A total of 109 symptomatic patients underwent CEA, 78% within 14 days of the index event and 90% within 14 days of referral. The median delay to surgery was 9 days from the index event and 4 days from referral. There were no perioperative deaths. Two strokes occurred (one intra-operative and one post-operative) to give a 30-day death/stroke rate of 1.83%. Patients undergoing CEA within 14 days of the index event incurred a death/stroke rate of 2.4% (2/84), increasing to 4.3% in patients undergoing surgery within 7 days (2/47).

CONCLUSION

Service reconfigurations can lead to significant reductions in delays to treatment in patients with symptomatic carotid disease. CEA can be performed in the hyperacute period without significantly increasing the operative risk.

摘要

目的

在经历短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或小中风后,再次中风的最高风险发生在第 7-14 天。当代指南建议在此期间进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),但存在以下两个问题:(1)如何在实际操作中实现这一点;(2)该政策是否会导致手术风险显著增加。

设计

这是一项前瞻性、连续研究,研究对象为在 2008 年 10 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 15 日创建快速 TIA 服务后,最近出现症状并接受 CEA 的患者,研究内容为手术延迟及 30 天内的结果。

结果

共有 109 名有症状的患者接受了 CEA 治疗,其中 78%在指数事件发生后 14 天内进行,90%在转诊后 14 天内进行。手术的中位数延迟时间为指数事件后 9 天,转诊后 4 天。无围手术期死亡。2 例患者发生中风(1 例术中,1 例术后),30 天死亡率/中风率为 1.83%。在指数事件发生后 14 天内接受 CEA 的患者死亡率/中风率为 2.4%(84 例中的 2 例),在 7 天内接受手术的患者死亡率/中风率增加到 4.3%(47 例中的 2 例)。

结论

服务重组可以显著减少有症状颈动脉疾病患者的治疗延迟。在超急性期进行 CEA 不会显著增加手术风险。

相似文献

1
Rapid access carotid endarterectomy can be performed in the hyperacute period without a significant increase in procedural risks.颈动脉内膜切除术可在超急性期进行,不会显著增加手术风险。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
2
Procedural risk following carotid endarterectomy in the hyperacute period after onset of symptoms.症状发作后超急性期行颈动脉内膜切除术的操作风险。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;46(5):519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
A retrospective study on early carotid endarterectomy within 48 hours after transient ischemic attack and stroke in evolution.一项关于短暂性脑缺血发作和进展性卒中后48小时内早期颈动脉内膜切除术的回顾性研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;28(1):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
Very urgent carotid endarterectomy does not increase the procedural risk.急诊颈动脉内膜切除术不会增加手术风险。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
Hyperglycemia independently increases the risk of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death after carotid endarterectomy.高血糖会独立增加颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期中风、心肌梗死和死亡的风险。
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jun;58(6):1066-73; discussion 1066-73. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215887.59922.36.
6
Carotid endarterectomy in the acute phase of crescendo cerebral transient ischemic attacks is safe and effective.在递增性短暂性脑缺血发作的急性期行颈动脉内膜切除术是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):637-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.055. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
7
Outcomes of urgent carotid endarterectomy for stable and unstable acute neurologic deficits.急行颈动脉内膜切除术治疗稳定和不稳定的急性神经功能缺损的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
The need for emergency surgical treatment in carotid-related stroke in evolution and crescendo transient ischemic attack.演变和渐强型短暂性脑缺血发作的颈动脉相关性卒中的紧急手术治疗需求。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.144. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
9
Carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischaemic attack: is it safe?急性脑缺血发作静脉溶栓后颈动脉内膜切除术:安全吗?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Urgent carotid endarterectomy in patients with recent/crescendo transient ischaemic attacks or acute stroke.近期/进展性短暂性脑缺血发作或急性卒中患者的紧急颈动脉内膜切除术。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;41(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound Assessment of Extracranial Carotids and Vertebral Arteries in Acute Cerebral Ischemia.急性脑缺血患者颅外颈动脉和椎动脉的超声评估
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 18;56(12):711. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120711.
2
Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术后住院期间和一年结局的时间效应。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1649-1657.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.148. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
ABCD risk score does not predict the presence of cerebral microemboli in patients with hyper-acute symptomatic critical carotid artery stenosis.
ABCD 风险评分不能预测超急性症状性临界颈内动脉狭窄患者的脑微栓塞存在。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Mar 17;2(2):41-46. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000073. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Stroke: Optimization of the timing of carotid endarterectomy.中风:颈动脉内膜切除术时机的优化
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Jul;8(7):367-8. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.116.