• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑缺血发作静脉溶栓后颈动脉内膜切除术:安全吗?

Carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischaemic attack: is it safe?

机构信息

Vascular Clinic, Gentofte Hospital and Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.020
PMID:23582885
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has proven effective in the treatment of acute cerebral ischaemic attack in selected cases. In the presence of a carotid artery stenosis, such patients may be candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Few studies have been made on the safety of CEA performed after IVT.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study. Data including 30 days' follow-up were obtained from medical records and from a vascular registry.

MATERIALS

A consecutive series of 306 patients were operated on for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis during a 5-year period. Among these, 22 (7%) patients had been treated with IVT for an acute cerebral ischaemic attack prior to CEA and 284 (93%) patients had CEA only.

METHODS

IVT as well as CEA was performed following established guidelines. CEA was performed in median 11 days (25 and 75% percentiles: 7-13 days) after the neurological index event in patients having undergone IVT and 12 days (25 and 75% percentiles: 8-21 days) in patients undergoing CEA only.

RESULTS

The 30 days' stroke and death rate was 0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-15%) in patients who had IVT before CEA and 2.4% (95% CI: 0.9-4.7%) in patients who underwent CEA only.

CONCLUSION

Our experience indicates that CEA performed after IVT for acute cerebral ischaemic attack is safe, confirming existing but sparse publications. However, our series is small and our study possesses a number of limitations. Thus, our results cannot necessarily be transferred to other units, who instead should perform similar studies, preferably together.

摘要

目的

静脉溶栓(IVT)已被证明在某些情况下对急性脑缺血性发作的治疗有效。在颈动脉狭窄的情况下,这些患者可能是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的候选者。很少有研究关注 IVT 后进行 CEA 的安全性。

设计

这是一项回顾性研究。数据包括从病历和血管登记处获得的 30 天随访。

材料

在 5 年期间,连续对 306 例症状性颈动脉狭窄患者进行了手术。其中,22 例(7%)患者在 CEA 前因急性脑缺血性发作接受了 IVT 治疗,284 例(93%)患者仅接受了 CEA。

方法

IVT 和 CEA 均按照既定指南进行。在接受 IVT 的患者中,CEA 在神经学指数事件后中位数 11 天(25%和 75%分位数:7-13 天)进行,在仅接受 CEA 的患者中,CEA 在 12 天(25%和 75%分位数:8-21 天)进行。

结果

在接受 IVT 后进行 CEA 的患者中,30 天的卒中率和死亡率为 0%(95%置信区间(CI):0-15%),而仅接受 CEA 的患者为 2.4%(95% CI:0.9-4.7%)。

结论

我们的经验表明,急性脑缺血性发作后进行 IVT 后进行 CEA 是安全的,证实了现有的但稀少的出版物。然而,我们的系列较小,我们的研究存在一些局限性。因此,我们的结果不一定可以推广到其他单位,而其他单位应该进行类似的研究,最好是联合进行。

相似文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischaemic attack: is it safe?急性脑缺血发作静脉溶栓后颈动脉内膜切除术:安全吗?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
2
Editor's choice - Safety of carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: a case-controlled multicentre registry study.编辑精选 - 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓后颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性:一项病例对照多中心登记研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Safety of Early Carotid Endarterectomy after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后早期颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.195. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Early carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后早期行颈动脉内膜切除术
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 May;37(5):512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.12.018. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
Carotid endarterectomy following thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗后行颈动脉内膜切除术
Vasa. 2017 Mar;46(2):116-120. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000601. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Very Early Carotid Endarterectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis.静脉溶栓后极早期颈动脉内膜切除术
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;51(4):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
7
Can Carotid Endarterectomy be Performed Safely within 14 days after Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke?急性卒中静脉溶栓治疗后14天内能否安全地进行颈动脉内膜切除术?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:385-389. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Carotid endarterectomy in the acute phase of crescendo cerebral transient ischemic attacks is safe and effective.在递增性短暂性脑缺血发作的急性期行颈动脉内膜切除术是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):637-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.055. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
9
A retrospective study on early carotid endarterectomy within 48 hours after transient ischemic attack and stroke in evolution.一项关于短暂性脑缺血发作和进展性卒中后48小时内早期颈动脉内膜切除术的回顾性研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;28(1):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
10
Primary stroke unit treatment followed by very early carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis after acute stroke.急性卒中后采用初级卒中单元治疗,随后对颈动脉狭窄进行极早期颈动脉内膜切除术。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(4):276-81. doi: 10.1159/000094016. Epub 2006 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society Guidelines for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.巴西血管病学与血管外科学会颅外脑血管疾病治疗指南
J Vasc Bras. 2024 May 31;23:e20230094. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300942. eCollection 2024.
2
Thrombolysis is an Independent Risk Factor for Poor Outcome After Carotid Revascularization.溶栓是颈动脉血运重建术后预后不良的独立危险因素。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Nov 1;83(5):922-930. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx551.