Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Mar 17;2(2):41-46. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000073. eCollection 2017 Jun.
ABCD risk score and cerebral microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler (TCD) have been separately shown to the predict risk of recurrent acute stroke. We studied whether ABCD risk score predicts cerebral microemboli in patients with hyper-acute symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
We studied 206 patients presenting within 2 weeks of transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke and found to have critical carotid artery stenosis (≥50%). 86 patients (age 70±1 (SEM: years), 58 men, 83 Caucasian) had evidence of microemboli; 72 (84%) of these underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). 120 patients (age 72±1 years, 91 men, 113 Caucasian) did not have microemboli detected; 102 (85%) of these underwent CEA. Data were analysed using and Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
140/206 (68%: 95% CI 61.63 to 74.37) patients with hyper-acute symptomatic critical carotid stenosis had an ABCD risk score ≥4. There was no significant difference in the NICE red flag criterion for early assessment (ABCD risk score ≥4) for patients with cerebral microemboli versus those without microemboli (59/86 vs 81/120 patients: OR 1.05 ABCD risk score ≥4 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.90, p=0.867)). The ABCD risk score was <4 in 27 of 86 (31%: 95% CI 21 to 41) embolising patients and in 39 of 120 (31%: 95% CI 23 to 39) without cerebral microemboli. After adjusting for pre-neurological event antiplatelet treatment (APT), area under the curve (AUC) of ROC for ABCD risk score showed no prediction of cerebral microemboli (no pre-event APT, n=57: AUC 0.45 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.60, p=0.531); pre-event APT, n=147: AUC 0.51 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.60, p=0.804)).
The ABCD score did not predict the presence of cerebral microemboli or carotid disease in over one-quarter of patients with symptomatic critical carotid artery stenosis. On the basis of NICE guidelines (refer early if ABCD ≥4), assessment of high stroke risk based on ABCD scoring may lead to inappropriate delay in urgent treatment in many patients.
ABCD 风险评分和经颅多普勒(TCD)检测到的脑微栓子分别被证明可以预测急性复发性中风的风险。我们研究了 ABCD 风险评分是否可以预测伴有超急性症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者的脑微栓子。
我们研究了 206 例在短暂性脑缺血发作或小卒中后 2 周内出现并发现有临界颈动脉狭窄(≥50%)的患者。86 例患者(年龄 70±1(SEM:岁),58 名男性,83 名白种人)有微栓子证据;72 例(84%)患者接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。120 例患者(年龄 72±1 岁,91 名男性,113 名白种人)未检测到微栓子;102 例(85%)患者接受了 CEA。数据分析采用 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。
206 例伴有超急性症状性临界颈动脉狭窄的患者中,有 140/206(68%:95%CI 61.63 至 74.37)例患者的 ABCD 风险评分≥4。伴有脑微栓子的患者与无微栓子的患者在早期评估的 NICE 危险标志(ABCD 风险评分≥4)方面无显著差异(59/86 例 vs 81/120 例患者:OR 1.05 ABCD 风险评分≥4(95%CI 0.58 至 1.90,p=0.867))。在 86 例栓塞患者中,有 27 例(31%:95%CI 21%至 41%)和在 120 例无脑微栓子患者中有 39 例(31%:95%CI 23%至 39%)的 ABCD 风险评分<4。在调整了神经前事件抗血小板治疗(APT)后,ROC 的 ABCD 评分的曲线下面积(AUC)显示不能预测脑微栓子(无神经前事件 APT,n=57:AUC 0.45(95%CI 0.29 至 0.60,p=0.531);神经前事件 APT,n=147:AUC 0.51(95%CI 0.42 至 0.60,p=0.804))。
ABCD 评分不能预测伴有症状性临界颈动脉狭窄的患者脑微栓子或颈动脉疾病的存在。基于 NICE 指南(如果 ABCD≥4,应及早评估),基于 ABCD 评分评估高卒中风险可能会导致许多患者不恰当地延迟紧急治疗。