Suppr超能文献

从跌倒经历、身体机能和年龄水平差异的角度出发,为社区居住的日本老年人的跌倒风险筛查选择有用项目。

Selection of useful items for fall risk screening for community dwelling Japanese elderly from the perspective of fall experience, physical function, and age level differences.

机构信息

Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kakuma, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;53(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine useful items for screening the fall risk of community dwelling elderly from various perspectives, including fall experience, physical function level, and age level difference. 968 independently living elderly persons over the age of 60 (age: 70.0 ± 7.0) responded to 80 fall risk items representing 7 factors (physical function, fall history, using devices, fear of falling and inactivity, dosing, disease and disability, and environment) and an ADL questionnaire. The high fall risk response rate was calculated for each item and tested for statistical significance among age groups and those with and without fall experience. Cramer's V was calculated to examine the relationship between each item and the ADL. In addition, we selected items with significant differences in the high fall risk response rates between the faller and the non-faller groups, a significant relationship with ADL, and a significant difference among age groups. A total of 40 useful items were selected from each fall risk factor (decrease in physical function: 21 items, fall history: 2 items, device usage: 3 items, fear of falling and inactivity: 5 items, dosing: 0 items, disease and disability: 8 items, and environment: 1 item). Selected items can comprehensively and properly assess the fall risk of the healthy elderly as compared with existing questionnaires.

摘要

本研究旨在从各种角度(包括跌倒经历、身体机能水平和年龄差异)探讨用于筛选社区居住老年人跌倒风险的有用项目。968 名 60 岁以上(年龄:70.0 ± 7.0)、独立生活的老年人对代表 7 个因素(身体机能、跌倒史、使用器械、跌倒恐惧和不活动、用药、疾病和残疾、环境)和 ADL 问卷的 80 个跌倒风险项目做出了回应。计算了每个项目的高跌倒风险反应率,并在年龄组之间以及有和无跌倒经历的人群中对其进行了统计学意义检验。计算了 Cramer's V 以检验每个项目与 ADL 的关系。此外,我们选择了在跌倒者和非跌倒者组之间高跌倒风险反应率存在显著差异、与 ADL 有显著关系且在年龄组之间存在显著差异的项目。每个跌倒风险因素(身体机能下降:21 项、跌倒史:2 项、器械使用:3 项、跌倒恐惧和不活动:5 项、用药:0 项、疾病和残疾:8 项、环境:1 项)均选择了 40 个有用项目。与现有问卷相比,所选项目可以全面、恰当地评估健康老年人的跌倒风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验