The effect of drill-free and drilling methods on the stability of mini-implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the stability of mini-implants using drill-free and drilling methods, both before and after early force loading. Sixty-two adolescent patients (24 males and 38 females, mean age 15.7 ± 4.2 years) were randomly assigned to three groups and 112 titanium mini-implants were placed between the upper first molars and second premolars to achieve molar distalization. Groups I (n = 22) and II (n = 20) received pilot drilling with diameters of 1.1 and 0.9 mm, respectively, while the drill-free method was used in group III (n = 20). Distalization forces of up to 200 g were applied with nickel-titanium (NiTi) open coil springs. The Z-test was used for statistical analyses to compare the success rates of the groups with each other. The overall success rate was 77.7 per cent. There was no significant difference between groups I and II either before or after loading. Significant differences were found between groups I and III (P = 0.0002) and between groups II and III (P = 0.045) both before and after loading. Mini-implants using the drill-free method provided the highest success rate before orthodontic force application and also maintained their stability after early loading for 1 month during orthodontic treatment. Smaller drill diameters can contribute to clinical stability of mini-implants in the short-term, however long-term evaluations are needed to clarify the stability of temporary skeletal anchorage devices throughout orthodontic loading.