Faraklas Iris, Lam Uyen, Cochran Amalia, Stoddard Gregory, Saffle Jeffrey
Burn-Trauma Center, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):91-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318204b379.
Fluid resuscitation of burned children is challenging because of their small size and intolerance to over- or underresuscitation. Our American Burn Association-verified regional burn center has used colloid "rescue" as part of our pediatric resuscitation protocol. With Institutional Review Board approval, the authors reviewed children with ≥15% TBSA burns admitted from January 1, 2004, to May 1, 2009. Resuscitation was based on the Parkland formula, which was adjusted to maintain urine output. Patients requiring progressive increases in crystalloid were placed on a colloid protocol. Results were expressed as an hourly resuscitation ratio (I/O ratio) of fluid infusion (ml/kg/%TBSA/hr) to urine output (ml/kg/hr). We reviewed 53 patients; 29 completed resuscitation using crystalloid alone (lactated Ringer's solution [LR]), and 24 received colloid supplementation albumin (ALB). Groups were comparable in age, gender, weight, and time from injury to admission. ALB patients had more inhalation injuries and larger total and full-thickness burns. LR patients maintained a median I/O of 0.17 (range, 0.08-0.31), whereas ALB patients demonstrated escalating ratios until the institution of albumin produced a precipitous return of I/O comparable with that of the LR group. Hospital stay was lower for LR patients than ALB patients (0.59 vs 1.06 days/%TBSA, P = .033). Twelve patients required extremity or torso escharotomy, but this did not differ between groups. There were no decompressive laparotomies. The median resuscitation volume for ALB group was greater than LR group (9.7 vs 6.2 ml/kg/%TBSA, P = .004). Measuring hourly I/O is a helpful means of evaluating fluid demands during burn shock resuscitation. The addition of colloid restores normal I/O in pediatric patients.
由于烧伤儿童体型小,且对补液过多或过少均不耐受,因此对他们进行液体复苏具有挑战性。我们经美国烧伤协会认证的地区烧伤中心已将胶体“救援”作为儿科复苏方案的一部分。经机构审查委员会批准,作者回顾了2004年1月1日至2009年5月1日期间收治的烧伤面积≥15%的儿童。复苏基于帕克兰公式,并根据尿量进行调整。需要逐渐增加晶体液量的患者采用胶体方案。结果以每小时液体输注量(毫升/千克/烧伤面积百分比/小时)与尿量(毫升/千克/小时)的复苏比(输入/输出比)表示。我们回顾了53例患者;29例仅使用晶体液(乳酸林格氏液[LR])完成复苏,24例接受了胶体补充白蛋白(ALB)。两组在年龄、性别、体重以及受伤至入院的时间方面具有可比性。接受白蛋白治疗的患者吸入性损伤更多,总的和全层烧伤面积更大。LR组患者的输入/输出比中位数为0.17(范围为0.08 - 0.31),而接受白蛋白治疗的患者的该比值不断上升,直到使用白蛋白后才急剧恢复到与LR组相当的水平。LR组患者的住院时间低于接受白蛋白治疗的患者(0.59天/烧伤面积百分比对1.06天/烧伤面积百分比,P = 0.033)。12例患者需要进行肢体或躯干焦痂切开术,但两组之间无差异。没有进行减压剖腹手术。接受白蛋白治疗组的复苏液量中位数大于LR组(9.7毫升/千克/烧伤面积百分比对6.2毫升/千克/烧伤面积百分比,P = 0.004)。测量每小时的输入/输出比是评估烧伤休克复苏期间液体需求的一种有用方法。添加胶体可使儿科患者恢复正常的输入/输出比。