Kahn Steven Alexander, Beers Ryan J, Lentz Christopher W
Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):110-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318204b336.
Resuscitation of burn victims with high-dose ascorbic acid (vitamin C [VC]) was reported in Japan in the year 2000. Benefits of VC include reduction in fluid requirements, resulting in less tissue edema and body weight gain. In turn, these patients suffer less respiratory impairment and reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation. Despite these results, few burn centers resuscitate patients with VC in fear that it may increase the risk of renal failure. A retrospective review of 40 patients with greater than 20% TBSA between 2007 and 2009 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: one received only lactated Ringer's (LR) solution and another received LR solution plus 66 mg/kg/hr VC. Both groups were resuscitated with the Parkland formula to maintain stable hemodynamics and adequate urine output (>0.5 ml/kg/hr). Patients with >10-hour delay in transfer to the burn center were excluded. Data collected included age, gender, weight, %TBSA, fluid administered in the first 24 hours, urine output in the first 24 hours, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. PaO2 in millimeters mercury:%FIO2 ratio and positive end-expiratory pressure were measured at 12-hour intervals, and hematocrit was measured at 6-hour intervals. Comorbidities, mortality, pneumonia, fasciotomies, and renal failure were also noted. After 7 patients were excluded, 17 patients were included in the VC group and 16 in the LR group. VC and LR were matched for age (42 ± 16 years vs 50 ± 20 years, P = .2), burn size (45 ± 21%TBSA vs 39 ± 15%TBSA, P = .45), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (17 ± 7 vs 18 ± 8, P = .8), and gender. Fluid requirements in the first 24 hours were 5.3 ± 1 ml/kg/%TBSA for VC and 7.1 ± 1 ml/kg/%TBSA for LR (P < .05). Urine output was 1.5 ± 0.4 ml/kg/hr for VC and 1 ± 0.5 ml/kg/hr for LR (P < .05). Vasopressors were needed in four VC patients and nine LR patients (P = .07). VC patients required vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure for a mean of 6 hours, but LR needed vasopressors for 11 hours (P = .2). No significant differences in PaO2 in millimeters mercury:%FIO2 ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure, frequency of pneumonia, renal failure, or inhalation injury were found. VC group had four mortalities, and LR group had three mortalities (P = 1). VC is associated with a decrease in fluid requirements and an increase in urine output during resuscitation after thermal injury. Although this study did not find a difference in outcomes with VC administration, it demonstrates that VC can be safely used without an increased risk of renal failure. The effects of VC should be further studied in a large-scale, prospective, randomized trial.
2000年日本报道了用大剂量抗坏血酸(维生素C [VC])对烧伤患者进行复苏。VC的益处包括减少液体需求,从而减轻组织水肿和体重增加。相应地,这些患者的呼吸功能损害较轻,对机械通气的需求减少。尽管有这些结果,但很少有烧伤中心用VC对患者进行复苏,因为担心这可能会增加肾衰竭的风险。对2007年至2009年间40例烧伤总面积大于20%的患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为两组:一组仅接受乳酸林格氏液(LR),另一组接受LR溶液加66mg/kg/小时的VC。两组均采用帕克兰公式进行复苏,以维持稳定的血流动力学和足够的尿量(>0.5ml/kg/小时)。烧伤后超过10小时才转至烧伤中心的患者被排除。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、体重、烧伤总面积百分比、头24小时内输入的液体量、头24小时内的尿量以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II。每隔12小时测量一次以毫米汞柱为单位的动脉血氧分压、吸氧浓度比和呼气末正压,并每隔6小时测量一次血细胞比容。还记录了合并症、死亡率、肺炎、筋膜切开术和肾衰竭情况。排除7例患者后,VC组纳入17例患者,LR组纳入16例患者。VC组和LR组在年龄(42±16岁对50±20岁,P = 0.2)、烧伤面积(45±21%烧伤总面积对39±15%烧伤总面积,P = 0.45)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(17±7对18±8,P = 0.8)和性别方面相匹配。头24小时内VC组的液体需求量为5.3±1ml/kg/%烧伤总面积,LR组为7.1±1ml/kg/%烧伤总面积(P < 0.05)。VC组的尿量为1.5±0.4ml/kg/小时,LR组为1±0.5ml/kg/小时(P < 0.05)。4例VC组患者和9例LR组患者需要血管升压药(P = 0.07)。VC组患者需要血管升压药维持平均动脉压的平均时间为6小时,而LR组需要11小时(P = 0.2)。在动脉血氧分压、吸氧浓度比、呼气末正压、肺炎发生率(频率)、肾衰竭或吸入性损伤方面未发现显著差异。VC组有4例死亡,LR组有3例死亡(P = 1)。热损伤复苏期间,VC与液体需求量减少和尿量增加有关。尽管本研究未发现使用VC在结局方面存在差异,但表明VC可安全使用,且不会增加肾衰竭风险。应在大规模、前瞻性、随机试验中进一步研究VC的作用。