Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Apr;24(4):579-84. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.219. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
The objective of our study was to study which is the most accurate specimen for histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (pseudocapsule or interface membrane). This is a prospective study including hip revision arthroplasties performed from January 2007 to June 2009. Specimens from pseudocapsule and from interface membrane were obtained from each patient. The histology was considered positive for infection when ≥5 neutrophils per high-power field ( × 40) were found. Definitive diagnosis of infection was considered when ≥2 cultures were positive for the same microorganism. According to the definition of infection, patients were classified in two groups: (A) patients with aseptic loosening in whom cultures obtained during surgery were negative and (B) patients with prosthetic joint infection. A total of 69 revisions were included in the study; 57 were classified in group A and 12 in group B. In group B, the percentage of positive interface membrane histology was significantly higher than the percentage of positive pseudocapsule histology (83 vs 42%, P=0.04, Fisher's exact test). The results suggest that periprosthetic interface membrane is the best specimen for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.
我们的研究目的是研究哪种标本对于假体关节感染(假囊或界面膜)的组织学诊断最准确。这是一项前瞻性研究,包括 2007 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月期间进行的髋关节翻修关节置换术。从每位患者中获得假囊和界面膜的标本。当高倍镜视野(×40)下每视野发现≥5 个中性粒细胞时,组织学被认为存在感染。当≥2 种培养物对同一微生物呈阳性时,被认为是感染的明确诊断。根据感染的定义,患者分为两组:(A)无菌性松动患者,术中获得的培养物为阴性,和(B)假体关节感染患者。共有 69 次翻修纳入研究;57 例归入组 A,12 例归入组 B。在组 B 中,界面膜组织学阳性的比例明显高于假囊组织学阳性的比例(83%比 42%,P=0.04,Fisher 确切检验)。结果表明,假体周围界面膜是假体关节感染组织学诊断的最佳标本。