• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯肾切除术真的简单吗?与根治性手术的比较。

Is simple nephrectomy truly simple? Comparison with the radical alternative.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Trinity College Dublin, Adelaide and Meath incorporating National Children's Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0651-7. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-010-0651-7
PMID:21132396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oxford English dictionary defines the term "simple" as "easily done" and "uncomplicated". We tested the validity of this terminology in relation to open nephrectomy surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 215 patients undergoing open, simple (n = 89) or radical (n = 126) nephrectomy in a single university-affiliated institution between 1998 and 2002. Operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), operative complications (OC) and length of stay in hospital (LOS) were analysed. Statistical analysis employed Fisher's exact test and Stata Release 8.2.

RESULTS

Simple nephrectomy was associated with shorter OT (mean 126 vs. 144 min; p = 0.002), reduced EBL (mean 729 vs. 859 cc; p = 0.472), lower OC (9 vs. 17%; 0.087), and more brief LOS (mean 6 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All parameters suggest favourable outcome for the simple nephrectomy group, supporting the use of this terminology. This implies "simple" nephrectomies are truly easier to perform with less complication than their radical counterpart.

摘要

背景

《牛津英语词典》将“简单”一词定义为“易于完成”和“不复杂”。我们在开放性肾切除术方面测试了这一术语的有效性。

方法

对 1998 年至 2002 年间在一家大学附属医院接受开放性简单(n=89)或根治性(n=126)肾切除术的 215 例患者进行回顾性分析。分析手术时间(OT)、估计失血量(EBL)、手术并发症(OC)和住院时间(LOS)。统计学分析采用 Fisher 确切检验和 Stata Release 8.2。

结果

简单肾切除术与较短的 OT(平均 126 对 144 分钟;p=0.002)、减少的 EBL(平均 729 对 859 cc;p=0.472)、较低的 OC(9 对 17%;0.087)和更短的 LOS(平均 6 对 8 天;p<0.001)相关。

结论

所有参数均表明简单肾切除术组的预后良好,支持这一术语的使用。这意味着“简单”的肾切除术确实比根治性手术更容易操作,并发症也更少。

相似文献

1
Is simple nephrectomy truly simple? Comparison with the radical alternative.单纯肾切除术真的简单吗?与根治性手术的比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0651-7. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
2
Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns.210例连续患者的腹腔镜与开放肾切除术:疗效、成本及实践模式的变化
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1889-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8808-3. Epub 2003 Oct 23.
3
A contemporary single-institution retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy for poorly functioning renal moieties in children with duplex collecting systems.当代单机构回顾性队列研究比较了机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术在双肾盂集合系统中功能不良肾单位的围手术期结局。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):549.e1-549.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.机器人辅助后腹腔镜部分肾切除术的技术和结果:一项多中心研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.肾计量评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜与开放性肾部分切除术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):679-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0801-x. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.部分腹腔镜肾切除术与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:T2 期肾癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):950-954. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0199. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.当代根治性肾切除术的并发症:开放手术与腹腔镜手术方法的比较
Urol Oncol. 2004 Mar-Apr;22(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00137-6.
9
Is retroperitoneoscopic renal ablative surgery easier and safer using a new hemostatic device compared with clips and monopolar coagulation? A comparative study.与夹子和单极电凝相比,使用新型止血装置进行后腹腔镜肾切除手术是否更简便、更安全?一项比较研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014 Jun;66(2):101-5.
10
Hand-assisted surgery improves outcomes for laparoscopic nephrectomy.手辅助手术可改善腹腔镜肾切除术的治疗效果。
Am Surg. 2003 Dec;69(12):1061-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Not-so-simple nephrectomy: Comparative analysis of radical and simple nephrectomy in a high-volume tertiary referral center.不那么简单的肾切除术:在一家高容量的三级转诊中心对根治性肾切除术和单纯性肾切除术的比较分析。
Int J Urol. 2024 Feb;31(2):160-168. doi: 10.1111/iju.15330. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Is simple nephrectomy the right nomenclature? - Comparing simple and radical nephrectomy to find the answer.单纯肾切除术这个命名恰当吗?——通过比较单纯肾切除术和根治性肾切除术来寻找答案。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):1059-1062. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1014_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Transthoracic nephrectomy.经胸肾切除术
J Urol. 1948 Dec;60(6):855-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69315-7.
2
Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy.肥胖患者接受腹腔镜根治性、部分或单纯肾切除术的并发症及预后差异。
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2287-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143820.56649.a4.
3
The value of the thoracoabdominal incision in the removal of kidney tumors.胸腹联合切口在肾肿瘤切除术中的价值。
N Engl J Med. 1949 Dec 15;241(24):951-60, illust. doi: 10.1056/NEJM194912152412401.
4
Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌根治性肾切除术
J Urol. 1963 Jan;89:37-42. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64494-X.
5
Radical nephrectomy--an assessment of morbidity, local control of disease and its effect on prognosis.根治性肾切除术——发病率评估、疾病的局部控制及其对预后的影响。
Br J Urol. 1980 Apr;52(2):84-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1980.tb02934.x.