Suppr超能文献

在平行任务中触觉与视觉偏差的比较。

Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task.

机构信息

Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3. Epub 2010 Dec 5.

Abstract

Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.

摘要

在触觉和视觉空间实验中都存在偏差,这些偏差被认为是由自我中心参照系的偏向影响造成的。这种影响的强度强烈依赖于参与者。通过使用平行性测试,研究了这种强度是否与模态无关。在触觉和视觉条件下,都发现了大的、系统的和依赖于参与者的偏差。然而,尽管触觉和视觉偏差之间存在显著相关性,但由于共同因素而解释的方差仅为 20%。因此,参与者的“自我中心”程度取决于模态,甚至更普遍地取决于实验条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472b/3018272/d0acd77c5b2f/221_2010_2500_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验