• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较不同的初始化协议以获得具有统计意义的分子动力学模拟。

A comparison of different initialization protocols to obtain statistically independent molecular dynamics simulations.

机构信息

Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Comput Chem. 2011 Jan 30;32(2):187-95. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21546.

DOI:10.1002/jcc.21546
PMID:21132839
Abstract

We study how the results of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are affected by various choices during the setup, e.g., the starting velocities, the solvation, the location of protons, the conformation of His, Asn, and Gln residues, the protonation and titration of His residues, and the treatment of alternative conformations. We estimate the binding affinity of ligands to four proteins calculated with the MM/GBSA method (molecular mechanics combined with a generalized Born and surface area solvation energy). For avidin and T4 lysozyme, all variations gave similar results within 2 kJ/mol. For factor Xa, differences in the solvation or in the selection of alternative conformations gave results that are significantly different from those of the other approaches by 4-6 kJ/mol, whereas for galectin-3, changes in the conformations, rotations, and protonation gave results that differed by 10 kJ/mol, but only if residues close to the binding site were modified. This shows that the results of MM/GBSA calculations are reasonably reproducible even if the MD simulations are set up with different software. Moreover, we show that the sampling of phase space can be enhanced by solvating the systems with different equilibrated water boxes, in addition to the common use of different starting velocities. If different conformations are available in the crystal structure, they should also be employed to enhance the sampling. Protonation, ionization, and conformations of Asn, Gln, and His may also be used to enhance sampling, but great effort should be spent to obtain as reliable predictions as possible close to the active site.

摘要

我们研究了在设置过程中(例如起始速度、溶剂化、质子位置、His、Asn 和 Gln 残基的构象、His 残基的质子化和滴定以及替代构象的处理)分子动力学(MD)模拟的结果如何受到各种选择的影响。我们使用 MM/GBSA 方法(分子力学与广义 Born 和表面面积溶剂化能相结合)计算了四个蛋白质配体的结合亲和力。对于亲和素和 T4 溶菌酶,所有变体在 2 kJ/mol 内给出了相似的结果。对于因子 Xa,溶剂化或替代构象的选择差异导致的结果与其他方法相差 4-6 kJ/mol,而对于半乳糖凝集素-3,构象、旋转和质子化的变化导致的结果相差 10 kJ/mol,但仅当接近结合位点的残基发生改变时才会如此。这表明即使使用不同的软件设置 MD 模拟,MM/GBSA 计算的结果也具有相当的可重现性。此外,我们还表明,通过用不同的平衡水盒对系统进行溶剂化,可以增强相空间的采样,除了常用的不同起始速度之外。如果晶体结构中存在不同的构象,也应该使用它们来增强采样。质子化、离子化以及 Asn、Gln 和 His 的构象也可以用于增强采样,但应该花费大量精力尽可能靠近活性位点获得尽可能可靠的预测。

相似文献

1
A comparison of different initialization protocols to obtain statistically independent molecular dynamics simulations.比较不同的初始化协议以获得具有统计意义的分子动力学模拟。
J Comput Chem. 2011 Jan 30;32(2):187-95. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21546.
2
How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results.如何获得统计学收敛的 MM/GBSA 结果。
J Comput Chem. 2010 Mar;31(4):837-46. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21366.
3
An MM/3D-RISM approach for ligand binding affinities.一种用于配体结合亲和力的 MM/3D-RISM 方法。
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jul 1;114(25):8505-16. doi: 10.1021/jp101461s.
4
Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.比较用于计算蛋白质-配体结合自由能的终点连续溶剂化方法。
Proteins. 2012 May;80(5):1326-42. doi: 10.1002/prot.24029. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
Binding affinities of factor Xa inhibitors estimated by thermodynamic integration and MM/GBSA.通过热力学积分和 MM/GBSA 估算的因子 Xa 抑制剂的结合亲和力。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Apr 25;51(4):947-58. doi: 10.1021/ci100458f. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
6
A challenging system: free energy prediction for factor Xa.一个具有挑战性的系统:因子 Xa 的自由能预测。
J Comput Chem. 2011 Jun;32(8):1743-52. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21758. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
7
Constant pH molecular dynamics in generalized Born implicit solvent.广义玻恩隐式溶剂中的恒pH分子动力学
J Comput Chem. 2004 Dec;25(16):2038-48. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20139.
8
Comparison of MM/GBSA calculations based on explicit and implicit solvent simulations.基于显式溶剂模拟和隐式溶剂模拟的 MM/GBSA 计算比较。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013 May 28;15(20):7731-9. doi: 10.1039/c3cp00116d. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Protein hinge bending as seen in molecular dynamics simulations of native and M61 mutant T4 lysozymes.在天然型和M61突变型T4溶菌酶的分子动力学模拟中观察到的蛋白质铰链弯曲。
Biopolymers. 1997 Apr 15;41(5):533-44. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(19970415)41:5<533::AID-BIP5>3.0.CO;2-N.
10
The normal-mode entropy in the MM/GBSA method: effect of system truncation, buffer region, and dielectric constant.MM/GBSA 方法中的标准态嫡:体系截断、缓冲区域和介电常数的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Aug 27;52(8):2079-88. doi: 10.1021/ci3001919. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproducibility of QM/MM Calculations for the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型主要蛋白酶的量子力学/分子力学计算的可重复性
J Chem Theory Comput. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00841.
2
Impact of Varying Velocities and Solvation Boxes on Alchemical Free-Energy Simulations.不同速度和溶剂化盒对炼金术自由能模拟的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Feb 24;65(4):2107-2115. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02236. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Interplay of halogen bonding and solvation in protein-ligand binding.蛋白质-配体结合中卤键与溶剂化作用的相互影响
iScience. 2024 Mar 29;27(4):109636. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109636. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
4
Fixing Flavins: Hijacking a Flavin Transferase for Equipping Flavoproteins with a Covalent Flavin Cofactor.固定黄素:劫持黄素转移酶为黄素蛋白装备共价黄素辅因子。
J Am Chem Soc. 2023 Dec 13;145(49):27140-27148. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c12009. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
5
Computation-Aided Engineering of Cytochrome P450 for the Production of Pravastatin.用于普伐他汀生产的细胞色素P450的计算辅助工程
ACS Catal. 2022 Dec 16;12(24):15028-15044. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03974. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Water structure in solution and crystal molecular dynamics simulations compared to protein crystal structures.与蛋白质晶体结构相比,溶液和晶体中的水结构的分子动力学模拟
RSC Adv. 2020 Feb 26;10(14):8435-8443. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09601a. eCollection 2020 Feb 24.
7
Benchmark Study of Redox Potential Calculations for Iron-Sulfur Clusters in Proteins.蛋白质中铁硫簇的氧化还原电位计算基准研究。
Inorg Chem. 2022 Apr 25;61(16):5991-6007. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03422. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Entropy-Entropy Compensation between the Protein, Ligand, and Solvent Degrees of Freedom Fine-Tunes Affinity in Ligand Binding to Galectin-3C.蛋白质、配体和溶剂自由度之间的熵-熵补偿微调配体与半乳糖凝集素-3C结合中的亲和力。
JACS Au. 2021 Apr 1;1(4):484-500. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.0c00094. eCollection 2021 Apr 26.
9
Exploring ligand dynamics in protein crystal structures with ensemble refinement.利用整体 refinement 方法探索蛋白质晶体结构中的配体动态。
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2021 Aug 1;77(Pt 8):1099-1115. doi: 10.1107/S2059798321006513. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
On the Use of Interaction Entropy and Related Methods to Estimate Binding Entropies.关于使用互信息和相关方法来估计结合熵。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Aug 10;17(8):5379-5391. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00374. Epub 2021 Jul 13.