Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, PO Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Centre for Molecular Protein Science, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, PO Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2021 Aug 1;77(Pt 8):1099-1115. doi: 10.1107/S2059798321006513. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
Understanding the dynamics of ligands bound to proteins is an important task in medicinal chemistry and drug design. However, the dominant technique for determining protein-ligand structures, X-ray crystallography, does not fully account for dynamics and cannot accurately describe the movements of ligands in protein binding sites. In this article, an alternative method, ensemble refinement, is used on six protein-ligand complexes with the aim of understanding the conformational diversity of ligands in protein crystal structures. The results show that ensemble refinement sometimes indicates that the flexibility of parts of the ligand and some protein side chains is larger than that which can be described by a single conformation and atomic displacement parameters. However, since the electron-density maps are comparable and R values are slightly increased, the original crystal structure is still a better model from a statistical point of view. On the other hand, it is shown that molecular-dynamics simulations and automatic generation of alternative conformations in crystallographic refinement confirm that the flexibility of these groups is larger than is observed in standard refinement. Moreover, the flexible groups in ensemble refinement coincide with groups that give high atomic displacement parameters or non-unity occupancy if optimized in standard refinement. Therefore, the conformational diversity indicated by ensemble refinement seems to be qualitatively correct, indicating that ensemble refinement can be an important complement to standard crystallographic refinement as a tool to discover which parts of crystal structures may show extensive flexibility and therefore are poorly described by a single conformation. However, the diversity of the ensembles is often exaggerated (probably partly owing to the rather poor force field employed) and the ensembles should not be trusted in detail.
理解配体与蛋白质结合的动力学是药物化学和药物设计中的一项重要任务。然而,确定蛋白质-配体结构的主要技术,即 X 射线晶体学,并没有充分考虑动力学,也不能准确描述配体在蛋白质结合部位的运动。在本文中,我们使用了一种替代方法,即集合精修,对六个蛋白质-配体复合物进行了研究,目的是了解蛋白质晶体结构中配体的构象多样性。结果表明,集合精修有时表明配体的某些部分和一些蛋白质侧链的灵活性大于单个构象和原子位移参数所能描述的范围。然而,由于电子密度图具有可比性,R 值略有增加,因此从统计学的角度来看,原始晶体结构仍然是一个更好的模型。另一方面,研究表明,分子动力学模拟和晶体学精修中自动生成替代构象证实,这些基团的灵活性大于标准精修中观察到的灵活性。此外,在集合精修中具有灵活性的基团与在标准精修中进行优化时会给出高原子位移参数或非整占据的基团相吻合。因此,集合精修所表明的构象多样性似乎在定性上是正确的,这表明集合精修可以作为一种工具,与标准晶体学精修互补,用于发现晶体结构的哪些部分可能表现出广泛的灵活性,因此用单个构象来描述是不准确的。然而,集合的多样性通常被夸大了(可能部分归因于所使用的相当差的力场),因此不应详细信任集合。