Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jul 1;114(25):8505-16. doi: 10.1021/jp101461s.
We have modified the popular MM/PBSA or MM/GBSA approaches (molecular mechanics for a biomolecule, combined with a Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born electrostatic and surface area nonelectrostatic solvation energy) by employing instead the statistical-mechanical, three-dimensional molecular theory of solvation (also known as 3D reference interaction site model, or 3D-RISM-KH) coupled with molecular mechanics or molecular dynamics ( Blinov , N. ; et al. Biophys. J. 2010 ; Luchko , T. ; et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010 ). Unlike the PBSA or GBSA semiempirical approaches, the 3D-RISM-KH theory yields a full molecular picture of the solvation structure and thermodynamics from the first principles, with proper account of chemical specificities of both solvent and biomolecules, such as hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, salt bridges, etc. We test the method on the binding of seven biotin analogues to avidin in aqueous solution and show it to work well in predicting the ligand-binding affinities. We have compared the results of 3D-RISM-KH with four different generalized Born and two Poisson-Boltzmann methods. They give absolute binding energies that differ by up to 208 kJ/mol and mean absolute deviations in the relative affinities of 10-43 kJ/mol.
我们通过使用统计力学的三维分子溶剂化理论(也称为 3D-参考相互作用位点模型或 3D-RISM-KH)代替了流行的 MM/PBSA 或 MM/GBSA 方法(生物分子的分子力学,结合泊松-玻尔兹曼或广义 Born 静电和表面积非静电溶剂化能),对其进行了修改,同时结合了分子力学或分子动力学(Blinov,N.等人,生物物理学报。2010 年;Luchko,T.等人,J.化学理论计算。2010 年)。与 PBSA 或 GBSA 半经验方法不同,3D-RISM-KH 理论从第一原理出发,对溶剂化结构和热力学给出了完整的分子图像,适当考虑了溶剂和生物分子的化学特异性,如氢键、疏水相互作用、盐桥等。我们在水相中七种生物素类似物与亲和素的结合上测试了该方法,并表明它能够很好地预测配体结合亲和力。我们将 3D-RISM-KH 的结果与四种不同的广义 Born 和两种泊松-玻尔兹曼方法进行了比较。它们给出的绝对结合能相差高达 208 kJ/mol,相对亲和力的平均绝对偏差为 10-43 kJ/mol。