Suppr超能文献

利用新型伤口成像系统对糖尿病足溃疡进行远程评估。

Remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using a novel wound imaging system.

机构信息

University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00645.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

Abstract

Telemedicine allows experts to assess patients in remote locations, enabling quality convenient, cost-effective care. To help assess foot wounds remotely, we investigated the reliability of a novel optical imaging system employing a three-dimensional camera and disposable optical marker. We first examined inter- and intraoperator measurement variability (correlation coefficient) of five clinicians examining three different wounds. Then, to assess of the system's ability to identify key clinically relevant features, we had two clinicians evaluate 20 different wounds at two centers, recording observations on a standardized form. Three other clinicians recorded their observations using only the corresponding three-dimensional images. Using the in-person assessment as the criterion standard, we assessed concordance of the remote with in-person assessments. Measurement variation of area was 3.3% for intraoperator and 11.9% for interoperator; difference in clinician opinion about wound boundary location was significant. Overall agreement for remote vs. in-person assessments was good, but was lowest on the subjective clinical assessments, e.g., value of debridement to improve healing. Limitations of imaging included inability to show certain characteristics, e.g., moistness or exudation. Clinicians gave positive feedback on visual fidelity. This pilot study showed that a clinician viewing only the three-dimensional images could accurately measure and assess a diabetic foot wound remotely.

摘要

远程医疗使专家能够评估远程患者,从而实现高质量、便捷且具有成本效益的医疗服务。为了帮助远程评估足部伤口,我们研究了一种新颖的光学成像系统,该系统采用三维相机和一次性光学标记物。我们首先检查了五名临床医生检查三种不同伤口时的测量变异性(相关系数)。然后,为了评估该系统识别关键临床相关特征的能力,我们让两名临床医生在两个中心评估 20 个不同的伤口,并在标准化表格上记录观察结果。另外三名临床医生仅使用相应的三维图像记录他们的观察结果。以面对面评估作为标准,我们评估了远程评估与面对面评估的一致性。内部操作员测量的面积变化为 3.3%,外部操作员为 11.9%;关于伤口边界位置的临床医生意见差异具有统计学意义。远程与面对面评估的总体一致性较好,但在主观临床评估方面(例如,清创术改善愈合的价值)最低。成像的局限性包括无法显示某些特征,例如湿润度或渗出。临床医生对视觉逼真度给予了积极的反馈。这项初步研究表明,仅查看三维图像的临床医生就可以远程准确地测量和评估糖尿病足伤口。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验