School of Clinical Sciences, Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, West End, QLD 4101, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4.
Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty diabetic foot ulcers were assessed live and photographed. Five independent observers remotely assessed the mobile phone images twice for presence of nine clinical characteristics and three treatment decisions. Positive likelihood (LLR+) and negative likelihood (LLR-) ratios were calculated for validity. Multirater Randolph's and bi-rater Bennet kappa values were calculated for reliability. LLR+ ranged from 1.3-4.2; LLR- ranged from 0.13-0.88; the treatment decision 'peri-wound debridement' was the only item with 'strong diagnostic evidence'. Inter-observer reliability kappa ranged from 0.09-0.71; test-retest reliability from 0.45-0.86; the treatment decision 'peri-wound debridement' was the only item with 'adequate agreement'. In conclusion, mobile phone images had low validity and reliability for remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument. Clinicians who use mobile phone images in clinical practice should obtain as much additional information as possible when making treatment decisions based on these images, and be cautious of the low diagnostic accuracy.
尽管移动电话图像在糖尿病足溃疡治疗的远程医疗中有应用潜力,但使用移动电话图像评估糖尿病足溃疡的诊断准确性尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定使用移动电话图像远程评估糖尿病足溃疡的有效性和可靠性。
对 50 例糖尿病足溃疡进行现场评估和拍照。5 名独立观察者两次远程评估移动电话图像,评估 9 种临床特征和 3 种治疗决策的存在情况。计算了阳性似然比(LLR+)和阴性似然比(LLR-)以评估有效性。计算了多评价者兰多德和双评价者贝内特kappa 值以评估可靠性。LLR+范围为 1.3-4.2;LLR-范围为 0.13-0.88;“伤口周围清创”是唯一具有“强诊断证据”的治疗决策。观察者间可靠性 kappa 值范围为 0.09-0.71;测试-重测可靠性范围为 0.45-0.86;“伤口周围清创”是唯一具有“足够一致性”的治疗决策。
总之,移动电话图像对糖尿病足溃疡的远程评估有效性和可靠性较低,不应作为独立的诊断工具。临床医生在基于这些图像做出治疗决策时,如果使用移动电话图像,应尽可能获取更多的附加信息,并谨慎对待低诊断准确性。