• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡骨头骨折切除关节成形术:长期随访。

Resection arthroplasty for radial head fractures: Long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona, Joan XXIII, Rovira and Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.005
PMID:21134664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex radial head fractures treated by early resection arthroplasty yield good clinical results at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Fifty-one radial head excisions were performed for the treatment of radial head fractures. Twenty-seven patients (20 men, 7 women) were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 37 (range, 18-61) and their fracture types according to the Mason classification were 5 type II, 16 type III, and 6 type IV. The mean follow-up period was 17 years (range, 10-24). Patients were clinically evaluated: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain scores, and strength. Degenerative changes, proximal migration of the radius, and carrying angle were measured.

RESULTS

The overall outcome of the MEPS was 96.4 (range, 70-100), 22 patients (81%) achieving an excellent result, 4 patients a good (15%), and 1 patient a fair result (4%). The mean DASH score was 4.89, with slightly better results in the Mason II group than the Mason III and IV patients (P = .15). VAS averaged 0.48 (range, 0-10). Twenty-three patients (85%) reported no pain. The mean range of motion was from 5° to 135°. Pronation averaged 83° and supination averaged 79°. Strength was maintained in 24 cases (88%). In 24 patients, osteoarthritic changes were present without clinical relevance. Proximal migration of the radius was recorded in 7 cases. Carrying angle increased significantly by 7° (15° compared with 8°).

CONCLUSION

Radial head fractures treated by early resection arthroplasty offer satisfactory functional results in 96% of patients at long-term follow-up, in spite of the radiographic degenerative changes present in the great majority of cases.

摘要

背景

对于桡骨头骨折,采用早期切除关节成形术治疗可获得长期随访的良好临床效果。

方法

对 51 例桡骨头切除术治疗桡骨头骨折患者进行回顾性分析。27 例患者(20 例男性,7 例女性),平均年龄 37 岁(范围 18-61 岁),按 Mason 分类,5 例 II 型,16 例 III 型,6 例 IV 型。平均随访时间 17 年(范围 10-24 年)。患者进行临床评估:Mayo 肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、上肢功能障碍评分(DASH)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和力量。测量退行性改变、桡骨近端迁移和携带角。

结果

MEPS 的总体结果为 96.4(范围 70-100),22 例(81%)患者获得优秀结果,4 例(15%)良好,1 例(4%)一般。平均 DASH 评分为 4.89,Mason II 组略优于 Mason III 和 IV 组(P=.15)。VAS 平均为 0.48(范围 0-10)。23 例(85%)患者无疼痛。平均活动范围为 5°-135°。旋前平均 83°,旋后平均 79°。24 例(88%)患者保持力量。24 例患者存在骨关节炎改变,但无临床相关性。7 例患者记录到桡骨近端迁移。携带角显著增加 7°(15°与 8°比较)。

结论

桡骨头骨折采用早期切除关节成形术治疗,在长期随访中,96%的患者获得满意的功能结果,尽管大多数病例存在放射学退行性改变。

相似文献

1
Resection arthroplasty for radial head fractures: Long-term follow-up.桡骨头骨折切除关节成形术:长期随访。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.005.
2
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
3
Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.采用金属桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00010.
4
Long-term results of radial head resection following isolated radial head fractures in patients younger than forty years old.四十岁以下患者孤立性桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):558-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00332.
5
Surgical treatment of the radial head is crucial for the outcome in terrible triad injuries of the elbow.对于肘部严重三联征损伤,桡骨头的手术治疗对于结果至关重要。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1620-1628. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0762.R1.
6
Results of acute excision of the radial head in elbow radial head fracture-dislocations.桡骨头骨折脱位时桡骨头急性切除术的结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;14(5):354-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200006000-00009.
7
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
8
A radial head prosthesis appears to be unnecessary in Mason-IV fracture dislocation.对于梅森四型骨折脱位,桡骨头假体似乎并无必要。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Jun;88(3):315-319. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1293440. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Radial head resection versus prosthetic arthroplasty in terrible triad injury: a retrospective comparative cohort study: a retrospective comparative cohort study.桡骨头切除术与假体关节成形术治疗恐怖三联征损伤:一项回顾性对比队列研究
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1499-1505. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0293.R1.
10
A retrospective comparative cohort study of radial head arthroplasty versus resection in complex elbow dislocations.桡骨头置换与切除术治疗复杂肘关节脱位的回顾性对比队列研究。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51 Suppl 1:S89-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comminuted Mason III/IV Radial Head Fractures: What Is the Best Treatment Between Prosthesis and Radial Head Resection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.粉碎性梅森III/IV型桡骨头骨折:假体植入与桡骨头切除术哪种治疗方法最佳?一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 6;14(5):1773. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051773.
2
Usefulness of multiple bioabsorbable Mg screws/K‑wires for comminuted radial head fractures.多根可生物吸收镁螺钉/克氏针治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的有效性
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2165-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06208-2. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Variation in radial head fracture treatment recommendations in terrible triad injuries is not influenced by viewing two-dimensional computed tomography.
对于复杂肘关节损伤中桡骨头骨折治疗建议的差异,二维计算机断层扫描观察并未产生影响。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):156-161. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01368. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
Midterm outcomes of 146 EVOLVE Proline modular radial head prostheses: a systematic review.146例EVOLVE脯氨酸模块化桡骨头假体的中期结果:一项系统评价。
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Apr;13(2):205-212. doi: 10.1177/1758573219850111. Epub 2019 May 19.
5
Clinical outcomes after internal fixation, arthroplasty and resection for treatment of comminuted radial head fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.内固定、关节置换和切除治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的临床疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr;105(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00679-3. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Indications and outcomes of radial head excision: A systematic review.桡骨头切除术的适应症与疗效:一项系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Jun;12(3):193-202. doi: 10.1177/1758573219864305. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.桡骨头置换术后不稳定骨折再次手术风险高:至少 8 年的长期随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2531-2540. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876.
8
Long-term Outcomes after Primary Radial Head Resection Arthroplasty vs. Acute Radial Head Resection vs. Secondary Prosthetic Removal in Comminuted Radial Head Fractures.粉碎性桡骨头骨折中一期桡骨头切除关节成形术与急性桡骨头切除及二期假体取出后的长期疗效比较。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Mar;7(2):112-117.
9
Maximizing outcomes in the treatment of radial head fractures.最大限度提高桡骨头骨折治疗效果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Mar 23;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0523-5.
10
The Best Option in Treatment of Modified Mason Type III Radial Head Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Excision.改良MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的最佳治疗选择:切开复位内固定与桡骨头切除术的对比
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Sep;6(5):365-370.