• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change.认知失调和选择诱发偏好改变的神经相关物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011879108. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
2
Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.艰难的决策塑造偏好的神经编码。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 23;39(4):718-726. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1681-18.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Cathodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex diminishes choice-induced preference change.左侧前额叶皮质的阴极经颅直流电刺激可减少选择诱导的偏好变化。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 May;25(5):1219-27. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht314. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
4
Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.选择我们喜欢的与喜欢我们选择的:选择诱发偏好改变如何真正对决策起到工具性作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0231081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231081. eCollection 2020.
5
Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Dissonance (Revised): An EEG Study.认知失调的神经机制(修订版):一项脑电图研究。
J Neurosci. 2017 May 17;37(20):5074-5083. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: a critical methodological review.自由选择范式中的选择诱导偏好变化:批判性方法学评论。
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 7;4:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00041. eCollection 2013.
7
Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance.神经活动预测认知失调中的态度改变。
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1469-74. doi: 10.1038/nn.2413. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
Effect of aging on choice-induced cognitive conflict.衰老对选择诱发的认知冲突的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 May 2;363:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.053. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.合理化的神经基础:决策过程中的认知失调减少。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):460-7. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq054. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
10
Choice both affects and reflects preferences.选择既影响偏好,又反映偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1415-27. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863953. Epub 2013 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive-Affective Dynamics of Political Attitude Polarization: EEG-Based Behavioral Evidence from a COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Task.政治态度两极分化的认知-情感动态:基于脑电图的新冠疫苗强制接种任务行为证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;15(8):1043. doi: 10.3390/bs15081043.
2
The more random people's preference judgments are, the more they explore in gambling tasks.人们的偏好判断越随机,他们在赌博任务中探索得就越多。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;12(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02252-0.
3
A cross-cultural comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational drives for learning.学习内在和外在动机驱动的跨文化比较。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb;25(1):25-44. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01228-2. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Generalized Encoding of the Relative Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in the Dorsal ACC.背侧前扣带回中认知努力相对主观价值的广义编码
J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;44(38):e0367242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0367-24.2024.
5
Internally Formed Preferences for Options only Influence Initial Decisions in Gambling Tasks, while the Gambling Outcomes do not Alter these Preferences.对选项的内在形成偏好仅影响赌博任务中的初始决策,而赌博结果不会改变这些偏好。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun;41(2):789-803. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10326-2. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
Choice enhances touch pleasantness.选择能增加触觉的愉悦感。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1709-1723. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02887-6. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.主动强化学习与动作偏差和滞后的比较:混合专家与非专家的控制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 29;20(3):e1011950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance.选择诱导偏好变化的神经调节:经颅直流电刺激对认知失调的研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 18;14:1104410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410. eCollection 2023.
9
Intrinsic motivation for choice varies with individual risk attitudes and the controllability of the environment.选择的内在动机因个体风险态度和环境的可控性而异。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 11;19(8):e1010551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010551. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Neurochronometry of choice-induced preference changes: when do preferences actually change?选择诱导偏好变化的神经计时学:偏好究竟何时发生变化?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 19;17:1222068. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1222068. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm.选择如何影响和反映偏好:重新审视自由选择范式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):573-94. doi: 10.1037/a0020217.
2
The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.合理化的神经基础:决策过程中的认知失调减少。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):460-7. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq054. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
3
I'm no longer torn after choice: how explicit choices implicitly shape preferences of odors.选择后不再纠结:明确选择如何隐晦地塑造对气味的偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):489-93. doi: 10.1177/0956797610364115. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
4
An automatic valuation system in the human brain: evidence from functional neuroimaging.人类大脑中的自动估值系统:来自功能神经成像的证据。
Neuron. 2009 Nov 12;64(3):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.040.
5
Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music.流行音乐对青少年音乐评价影响的神经机制
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2687-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.070. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
6
The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy.决策的神经生物学:共识与争议
Neuron. 2009 Sep 24;63(6):733-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003.
7
Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance.神经活动预测认知失调中的态度改变。
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1469-74. doi: 10.1038/nn.2413. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome.选择如何揭示并塑造预期的享乐结果。
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3760-5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4972-08.2009.
9
Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex.冲突诱发的行为调整:前额叶皮质执行功能的线索
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Feb;10(2):141-52. doi: 10.1038/nrn2538.
10
Reinforcement learning: the good, the bad and the ugly.强化学习:优点、缺点与不足。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

认知失调和选择诱发偏好改变的神经相关物。

Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change.

机构信息

Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo 194-8610, Japan.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011879108. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1011879108
PMID:21135218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3009797/
Abstract

According to many modern economic theories, actions simply reflect an individual's preferences, whereas a psychological phenomenon called "cognitive dissonance" claims that actions can also create preference. Cognitive dissonance theory states that after making a difficult choice between two equally preferred items, the act of rejecting a favorite item induces an uncomfortable feeling (cognitive dissonance), which in turn motivates individuals to change their preferences to match their prior decision (i.e., reducing preference for rejected items). Recently, however, Chen and Risen [Chen K, Risen J (2010) J Pers Soc Psychol 99:573-594] pointed out a serious methodological problem, which casts a doubt on the very existence of this choice-induced preference change as studied over the past 50 y. Here, using a proper control condition and two measures of preferences (self-report and brain activity), we found that the mere act of making a choice can change self-report preference as well as its neural representation (i.e., striatum activity), thus providing strong evidence for choice-induced preference change. Furthermore, our data indicate that the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tracked the degree of cognitive dissonance on a trial-by-trial basis. Our findings provide important insights into the neural basis of how actions can alter an individual's preferences.

摘要

根据许多现代经济理论,行动仅仅反映了个人的偏好,而一种被称为“认知失调”的心理现象则声称,行动也可以创造偏好。认知失调理论指出,在对两个同样偏好的项目进行艰难选择之后,拒绝一个喜欢的项目的行为会引起一种不舒服的感觉(认知失调),这反过来又激励个体改变他们的偏好以匹配他们之前的决定(即,减少对被拒绝项目的偏好)。然而,最近 Chen 和 Risen [Chen K, Risen J (2010) J Pers Soc Psychol 99:573-594] 指出了一个严重的方法论问题,这使得人们对过去 50 年来研究的这种选择引起的偏好变化的存在产生了怀疑。在这里,我们使用适当的对照条件和两种偏好测量方法(自我报告和大脑活动),发现仅仅做出选择的行为就可以改变自我报告的偏好及其神经表现(即纹状体活动),从而为选择引起的偏好变化提供了有力的证据。此外,我们的数据表明,前扣带皮层和背外侧前额叶皮层在逐次试验的基础上跟踪认知失调的程度。我们的发现为行动如何改变个体偏好的神经基础提供了重要的见解。