Suppr超能文献

随机 II 期试验:单药氨柔比星或拓扑替康作为一线铂类化疗敏感的小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗。

Randomized phase II trial of single-agent amrubicin or topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

机构信息

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, 10103 Ridgegate Pkwy G-01, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):287-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8851. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-agent amrubicin versus topotecan in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to amrubicin (40 mg/m(2)/d in a 5-minute intravenous [IV] infusion, days 1 through 3, every 21 days) or topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/d in a 30-minute IV infusion, days 1 through 5, every 21 days). The primary efficacy end point was overall response rate (ORR) for amrubicin. Secondary end points included time to progression, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 76 patients enrolled, 50 patients were randomly assigned to amrubicin, and 26 patients were randomly assigned to topotecan. Amrubicin treatment resulted in a significantly higher ORR than topotecan (44% v 15%; P = .021). Median PFS and median OS were 4.5 months and 9.2 months with amrubicin and 3.3 months and 7.6 months with topotecan, respectively. Tolerability was similar with both agents. However, grade 3 or worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seemed to be more frequent in the topotecan group as compared with the amrubicin group (78% and 61% v 61% and 39%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin shows promising activity, with an ORR of 44% compared with an ORR of 15% for topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with SCLC sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. In addition, the safety profiles were comparable; however, a trend was noted for more frequent grade 3 or worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the topotecan group as compared with the amrubicin group. Additional studies are ongoing.

摘要

目的

本 II 期研究评估了单药氨柔比星对比拓扑替康在一线铂类化疗敏感的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者中的安全性和疗效。

患者和方法

患者随机以 2:1 的比例分配至氨柔比星(40 mg/m2/天,5 分钟静脉内[IV]输注,第 1 至 3 天,每 21 天 1 次)或拓扑替康(1.5 mg/m2/天,30 分钟 IV 输注,第 1 至 5 天,每 21 天 1 次)组。主要疗效终点为氨柔比星的总缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、中位 PFS 和中位总生存期(OS)。

结果

76 例患者入组,50 例患者随机分配至氨柔比星组,26 例患者随机分配至拓扑替康组。氨柔比星治疗的 ORR 显著高于拓扑替康(44%比 15%;P =.021)。氨柔比星组的中位 PFS 和中位 OS 分别为 4.5 个月和 9.2 个月,拓扑替康组则分别为 3.3 个月和 7.6 个月。两种药物的耐受性相似。然而,与氨柔比星组相比,拓扑替康组更常发生 3 级或更高级别的中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少(78%比 61%;61%比 39%)。

结论

与拓扑替康二线治疗一线铂类化疗敏感的 SCLC 患者的 15%ORR 相比,氨柔比星显示出有前景的疗效,ORR 为 44%。此外,安全性谱相当,但与氨柔比星组相比,拓扑替康组更常出现 3 级或更高级别的中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少。正在进行更多的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验