Department of Anesthesiology, Fatih University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;45(7):e72-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318201fbce.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sedo-analgesia with alfentanyl/fentanyl, using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, may have positive outcomes in terms of safety, postprocedural workload, and expectations of the colonoscopist, nurse, and patients in elective colonoscopy.
One hundred American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II adult patients.
Patients were randomized in a double-blind trial to receive either alfentanyl (n=50) or fentanyl (n=50) by PCA, and incremental doses of midazolam.
Patient expectations were assessed using hemodynamic variables, willingness to have a repeat colonoscopy in the same way, adverse events, discomfort scores, and patient/operator/nurse satisfaction associated with sedo-analgesia.
All patients in both groups had adequate sedo-analgesia with high satisfaction and willingness scores. There were no serious adverse effects and except for a few events, no required medication. The total sedation times were shorter in the alfentanyl group compared with the fentanyl group.
PCA and sedation with alfentanyl and fentanyl for colonoscopy are safe, feasible, and acceptable to most patients. However, shorter sedation times make alfentanyl more attractive for postprocedural workload.
本研究旨在评估在接受择期结肠镜检查的患者中,使用患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵给予阿芬太尼/芬太尼镇静镇痛是否在安全性、术后工作量以及结肠镜医师、护士和患者的期望方面具有积极的效果。
100 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I 和 II 级的成年患者。
患者被随机分为双盲试验,接受阿芬太尼(n=50)或芬太尼(n=50)PCA 治疗,并给予咪达唑仑增量剂量。
使用血流动力学变量评估患者的期望,评估再次以相同方式接受结肠镜检查的意愿、不良事件、不适评分以及与镇静镇痛相关的患者/操作者/护士满意度。
两组患者均有足够的镇静镇痛效果,满意度和意愿评分均较高。两组均未发生严重不良事件,除少数事件外,均无需用药。与芬太尼组相比,阿芬太尼组的总镇静时间更短。
阿芬太尼和芬太尼用于结肠镜检查的 PCA 和镇静是安全、可行且可被大多数患者接受的。然而,较短的镇静时间使得阿芬太尼在术后工作量方面更具吸引力。