• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响参与儿科姑息治疗项目患儿家长决策冲突的因素。

Factors affecting decisional conflict for parents with children enrolled in a paediatric palliative care programme.

作者信息

Knapp Caprice, Madden Vanessa, Wang Hua, Curtis Charlotte, Sloyer Phyllis, Shenkman Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, USA.

出版信息

Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Nov;16(11):542-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.11.80020.

DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.11.80020
PMID:21135787
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Palliative care programmes have the potential to affect several health outcomes for children and families, including reducing decisional conflict.

METHOD

A telephone survey was conducted with 140 parents of children with life-limiting illnesses enrolled in Florida's publicly funded paediatric palliative care programme (Partners in Care: Together for Kids).

RESULTS

Multivariate results suggest that parents with less than a high school education had decisional conflict scores (DCS) that were 13 points higher (p<0.05) than parents with some college education. In addition, parents who indicated that they had recently made a decision for their children had DCS scores that were 7 points higher (p<0.05) than parents who indicated they had not.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that paediatric palliative care programmes should treat parents with lower educational levels as being particularly vulnerable and should consider allocating additional resources to them when a decision for their children is imminent.

摘要

未标注

姑息治疗项目有可能影响儿童及其家庭的多项健康结局,包括减少决策冲突。

方法

对佛罗里达州公共资助的儿科姑息治疗项目(关爱伙伴:携手为儿童)中登记的140名患有危及生命疾病儿童的父母进行了电话调查。

结果

多变量结果表明,受教育程度低于高中的父母的决策冲突得分(DCS)比受过一些大学教育的父母高13分(p<0.05)。此外,表示最近为孩子做出决定的父母的DCS得分比表示未做出决定的父母高7分(p<0.05)。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,儿科姑息治疗项目应将教育水平较低的父母视为特别脆弱的群体,并在即将为其子女做出决定时考虑为他们分配额外资源。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting decisional conflict for parents with children enrolled in a paediatric palliative care programme.影响参与儿科姑息治疗项目患儿家长决策冲突的因素。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Nov;16(11):542-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.11.80020.
2
Family support in pediatric palliative care: how are families impacted by their children's illnesses?儿科姑息治疗中的家庭支持:家庭如何受到其子女疾病的影响?
J Palliat Med. 2010 Apr;13(4):421-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0295.
3
Music therapy in an integrated pediatric palliative care program.综合儿科姑息治疗项目中的音乐疗法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26(6):449-55. doi: 10.1177/1049909109341870. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
4
Decision-Making Quality in Parents Considering Adenotonsillectomy or Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Their Children.父母在考虑为孩子行腺样体切除术或鼓膜切开置管术时的决策质量。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):260-266. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365.
5
Children with special health care needs enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP): patient characteristics and health care needs.参加州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:患者特征与医疗保健需求。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e508.
6
An evaluation of two decision-making scales for children with life-limiting illnesses.评估两种用于患有危及生命疾病的儿童的决策量表。
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):518-25. doi: 10.1177/0269216309104892. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
7
Does decisional conflict differ across race and ethnicity groups? A study of parents whose children have a life-threatening illness.不同种族和族裔群体的决策冲突是否存在差异?一项针对其子女患有危及生命疾病的父母的研究。
J Palliat Med. 2014 May;17(5):559-67. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0604. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Supportive and palliative care needs of families of children who die from cancer: an Australian study.死于癌症儿童家庭的支持性和姑息治疗需求:一项澳大利亚的研究。
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):59-69. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084608.
9
Structured shared decision-making using dialogue and visualization: a randomized controlled trial.基于对话和可视化的结构化共享决策:一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions.神经疾病患儿父母的决策满意度、后悔和冲突。
J Pediatr. 2022 Jun;245:81-88.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Achieving beneficial outcomes for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions receiving palliative care and their families: A realist review.为接受姑息治疗的患有危及生命和生命有限的疾病的儿童及其家庭实现良好结局:一个实际情况的综述。
Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;34(3):387-402. doi: 10.1177/0269216319870647. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
Parental decision making involvement and decisional conflict: a descriptive study.
父母决策参与度与决策冲突:一项描述性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0899-4.
4
Conflict in a paediatric hospital: a prospective mixed-method study.儿童医院中的冲突:一项前瞻性混合方法研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Jan;101(1):23-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308814. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Specialized pediatric palliative home care: a prospective evaluation.儿科姑息治疗家庭护理专业化:前瞻性评估。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;16(12):1588-94. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0129. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
6
Reporting of pediatric palliative care: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.儿科姑息治疗的报告:姑息治疗期刊中研究出版物的系统评价与定量分析
Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;17(3):202-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.92337.
7
Preferences for end-of-life care for children with cancer.癌症患儿临终关怀的偏好。
CMAJ. 2011 Nov 22;183(17):E1250-1. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111557. Epub 2011 Oct 17.