• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对男性进行敏感问题研究时的问题与考量:来自一项男性与性健康研究的实例

Issues and considerations when researching sensitive issues with men: examples from a study of men and sexual health.

作者信息

Walls Paula, Parahoo Kader, Fleming Paul, McCaughan Eilis

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Ulster, County Londonderry, UK.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):26-34. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.26.c8045.

DOI:10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.26.c8045
PMID:21138083
Abstract

This article highlights some ethical considerations and practicalities that arose when conducting research with men in relation to decision making and seeking help for a sexually transmitted infection (STI). The aim of the study was to explore, using a grounded theory approach, the processes involved in making the decision to seek help. The main issues that arose were in relation to seeking permission and gaining approval, obtaining informed consent and susceptibility to harm. The interview itself and the concept of the researcher as a tool of data collection also gave rise to ethical issues. These issues have implications for the conduct of sensitive research with men and highlight the need for more overt reporting of the ethical issues and practical considerations that arise when planning and conducting research.

摘要

本文重点介绍了在针对男性进行性传播感染(STI)决策和寻求帮助的研究时出现的一些伦理考量和实际问题。该研究的目的是采用扎根理论方法探索做出寻求帮助决策所涉及的过程。出现的主要问题涉及寻求许可和获得批准、获取知情同意以及易受伤害性。访谈本身以及将研究者作为数据收集工具的概念也引发了伦理问题。这些问题对针对男性开展敏感性研究具有影响,并凸显了在规划和开展研究时更公开报告所出现的伦理问题和实际考量的必要性。

相似文献

1
Issues and considerations when researching sensitive issues with men: examples from a study of men and sexual health.在对男性进行敏感问题研究时的问题与考量:来自一项男性与性健康研究的实例
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):26-34. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.26.c8045.
2
The interview in qualitative research.定性研究中的访谈
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):124-5.
3
Exploring the ethical issues of the research interview in the cancer context.探讨癌症背景下研究访谈中的伦理问题。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Feb;10(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
4
Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.现象学研究中的伦理考量
Nurse Res. 2007;14(3):36-45. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.04.14.3.36.c6031.
5
Ethical challenges in qualitative research: examples from practice.定性研究中的伦理挑战:实践案例
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):15-25. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.15.c8044.
6
Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics.与敏感话题定性电话访谈相关的方法学和伦理问题。
Nurse Res. 2014 Mar;21(4):32-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229.
7
Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review.针对儿童和青少年开展定性研究时的方法学与伦理问题:一项文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
8
Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia.访谈痴呆症患者时的伦理和方法学问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Sep;14(5):608-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
9
Navigating uncharted water: research ethics and emotional engagement in human inquiry.探索未知领域:人类研究中的研究伦理与情感投入。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Aug;13(4):423-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00999.x.
10
Researching with people you know: issues in interviewing.与熟人进行研究:访谈中的问题
Contemp Nurse. 2009;34(1):2-9. doi: 10.5172/conu.2009.34.1.002.

引用本文的文献

1
"We Are Not Truly Friendly Faces": Primary Health Care Doctors' Reflections on Sexual History Taking in North West Province.“我们并非真正友善的面孔”:西北省基层医疗医生对性病史询问的反思
Sex Med. 2022 Dec;10(6):100565. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100565. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.聚焦于夫妻的干预措施对局限性前列腺癌男性及其配偶的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
3
Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation.
大学生使用无关问题模型(UQM)的身体和认知兴奋剂:评估接受敏感问题的概率对患病率估计的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0197270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197270. eCollection 2018.
4
; a qualitative study of men's perceptions of their influence on breastfeeding decision-making.一项关于男性对其在母乳喂养决策中影响力认知的定性研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2018 Jan 16;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0145-1. eCollection 2018.