Smith Brian R, Chang Kenneth J, Lee John G, Nguyen Ninh T
Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California 92868, USA.
Am Surg. 2010 Nov;76(11):1228-31.
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a common staging modality used in patients with esophageal cancer. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of EUS in determining the depth of penetration (T stage) and nodal status (N stage) in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). A retrospective analysis of all patients at a university hospital who underwent preoperative EUS followed by MIE for cancer was performed. We compared the results of preoperative EUS to final pathologic analyses of the esophageal specimen, examining the accuracy of EUS staging. Ninety-five patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE had preoperative EUS. Twenty-four of the 95 patients were excluded for lack of a repeat EUS after neoadjuvant therapy before resection. Hence, 71 patients were evaluated for the accuracy of EUS staging. The accuracy of EUS for T0 disease was 80 per cent; T1 disease was 75 per cent; T2 disease was 39 per cent; and T3 disease was 88 per cent. The overall EUS accuracy for T stage was 72 per cent with overstaging occurring mostly for pathologic T1 tumors in 18 per cent and understaging occurring mostly for pathologic T3 tumors in 11 per cent. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of nodal involvement were 79 per cent and 74 per cent, respectively. However the accuracy for T and N staging by EUS after neoadjuvant therapy decreased to 63 per cent and 38 per cent, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound in the absence of neoadjuvant therapy is a relatively accurate and sensitive modality for determining the depth of tumor penetration and the presence of nodal disease in patients with esophageal carcinoma. The accuracy for T and N staging is less reliable after neoadjuvant therapy.
内镜超声检查(EUS)是食管癌患者常用的分期方法。本分析的目的是评估EUS在确定接受微创食管切除术(MIE)的食管癌患者肿瘤浸润深度(T分期)和淋巴结状态(N分期)方面的准确性和敏感性。对某大学医院所有接受术前EUS检查并随后接受MIE治疗癌症的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们将术前EUS的结果与食管标本的最终病理分析结果进行比较,以检验EUS分期的准确性。95例接受MIE的食管癌患者进行了术前EUS检查。95例患者中有24例因在切除术前新辅助治疗后未进行重复EUS检查而被排除。因此,对71例患者的EUS分期准确性进行了评估。EUS对T0期疾病的准确性为80%;T1期疾病为75%;T2期疾病为39%;T3期疾病为88%。EUS对T分期的总体准确性为72%,其中过度分期主要发生在18%的病理T1肿瘤中,而分期不足主要发生在11%的病理T3肿瘤中。检测淋巴结受累的敏感性和特异性分别为79%和74%。然而,新辅助治疗后EUS对T和N分期的准确性分别降至63%和38%。在没有新辅助治疗的情况下,内镜超声是确定食管癌患者肿瘤浸润深度和淋巴结疾病存在情况的一种相对准确和敏感的方法。新辅助治疗后T和N分期的准确性可靠性较低。