Amygdala Ltd, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):251-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.541022. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
To evaluate the two-compound formulation (TCF) calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (BDP) gel versus other topical therapies for scalp psoriasis in adults using direct and indirect comparisons.
A systematic review identified 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of topical treatments used in clinical practice for moderately severe scalp psoriasis. A meta-analysis was undertaken to obtain estimates of clinical effectiveness using recommended efficacy and safety outcome measures. We determined the proportion of responding patients using two definitions: i) 'controlled disease' using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) rating scale and ii) a score of 0 or 1 on the Total Sign Score (TSS). Tolerability was extracted in terms of percentages of patients experiencing all adverse events (AEs), skin AEs and withdrawals due to AEs. Direct comparisons were performed where head-to-head data were available. For other comparators where TCF gel was compared indirectly, 'pairs' of trials were compared on the basis of a common comparator using meta-regression in order to derive an indirect comparison estimate, while preserving randomisation within trials. Assumptions of comparability were considered regarding study homogeneity (data can be pooled in a meta-analysis), similarity of trials (clinical and methodological) and consistency of findings from direct and indirect evidence.
The meta-analysis showed that TCF gel was statistically significantly more effective than other topical treatments in terms of achieving a response defined according to both IGA and TSS criteria. TCF gel was generally associated with a statistically significant lower risk of AEs, skin AEs or patients withdrawing from RCTs due to AEs.
Although direct and indirect evidence in this analysis is sparse, this indirect comparison suggests that the TCF gel has significant benefits over other topical therapies considered in the routine management of patients with moderately severe scalp psoriasis. Despite other analysis limitations in terms of study heterogeneity inevitable across an evidence base spanning decades, these results were consistent, using a number of efficacy and tolerability outcome measures.
通过直接和间接比较,评估二联复方制剂(TCF)钙泊三醇和倍他米松二丙酸酯(BDP)凝胶与其他治疗成人头皮银屑病的局部治疗方法。
系统综述确定了 10 项在临床实践中用于治疗中度至重度头皮银屑病的局部治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用荟萃分析获得使用推荐的疗效和安全性结局指标的临床疗效估计值。我们根据以下两种定义确定应答患者的比例:i)使用研究者全球评估(IGA)评分量表的“控制疾病”,ii)总评分(TSS)得分为 0 或 1。从患者百分比的角度提取耐受性,包括出现所有不良事件(AE)、皮肤 AE 和因 AE 退出的患者百分比。在有头对头数据的情况下进行直接比较。对于其他间接比较 TCF 凝胶的比较者,在基于共同比较者的基础上使用元回归比较“对”试验,以得出间接比较估计值,同时保留试验内的随机化。关于研究同质性(数据可以在荟萃分析中汇总)、试验相似性(临床和方法学)以及直接和间接证据的一致性,考虑了可比性的假设。
荟萃分析表明,TCF 凝胶在根据 IGA 和 TSS 标准定义的应答方面,在统计学上显著优于其他局部治疗方法。TCF 凝胶通常与 AE、皮肤 AE 或因 AE 退出 RCT 的患者的风险较低相关。
尽管此间接比较中的直接和间接证据很少,但该间接比较表明,在中度至重度头皮银屑病患者的常规治疗中,TCF 凝胶与其他局部治疗方法相比具有显著优势。尽管从跨越数十年的证据基础的研究异质性方面存在其他分析限制,但这些结果使用了多种疗效和耐受性结局指标,是一致的。