Department of Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Sex Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):783-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02142.x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
With regard to transsexual developments, onset age (OA) appears to be the starting point of different psychosexual pathways.
To explore differences between transsexual adults with an early vs. late OA.
Data were collected within the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence using the Dutch Biographic Questionnaire on Transsexualism (Biografische Vragenlijst voor Transseksuelen) and a self-constructed score sheet according to the DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, Text Revision) criteria of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) and Gender Identity Disorder in Childhood (GIDC). One hundred seventy participants were included in the analyses.
Transsexual adults who, in addition to their GID diagnosis, also fulfilled criteria A and B of GIDC ("a strong cross-gender identification,""persistent discomfort about her or his assigned sex") retrospectively were considered as having an early onset (EO). Those who fulfilled neither criteria A nor B of GIDC were considered as having a late onset (LO). Participants who only fulfilled criterion A or B of GIDC were considered a residual (RES) group.
The majority of female to males (FtMs) appeared to have an early OA (EO = 60 [77.9%] compared to LO = 10 [13%] and to RES = 7 [9.1%]). Within male to females (MtFs), percentages of EO and LO developments were more similar (EO = 36 [38.7%], LO = 45 [48.4%], RES = 12 [12.9%]). FtMs presented to gender clinics at an earlier age than MtFs (28.04 to 36.75). The number of EO vs. LO transsexual adults differed from country to country (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway).
OA has a discriminative value for transsexual developments and it would appear that retrospective diagnosis of GIDC criteria is a valid method of assessment. Differences in OA and sex ratio exist between European countries.
就易性癖的发展而言,发病年龄(OA)似乎是不同性心理途径的起点。
探索发病年龄早(EO)和晚(LO)的易性癖成人之间的差异。
该研究的数据是通过欧洲性别不一致调查网络收集的,使用了荷兰易性癖自传体问卷(Biografische Vragenlijst voor Transseksuelen)和根据 DSM-IV-TR(《精神疾病的诊断与统计手册,第四版修订本》)性别认同障碍(GID)和儿童期性别认同障碍(GIDC)标准自我构建的评分表。共纳入 170 名参与者进行分析。
除 GID 诊断外,还符合 GIDC 标准 A 和 B(“强烈的跨性别认同”、“对其指定性别的持续不适”)的易性癖成人被认为是发病年龄早(EO)。既不符合 GIDC 标准 A 也不符合标准 B 的被认为是发病年龄晚(LO)。仅符合 GIDC 标准 A 或 B 的被认为是残留(RES)组。
大多数女性变男性(FtM)似乎发病年龄早(EO=60[77.9%],LO=10[13%],RES=7[9.1%])。而男性变女性(MtF)中 EO 和 LO 发展的比例更为相似(EO=36[38.7%],LO=45[48.4%],RES=12[12.9%])。FtM 比 MtF 更早到性别诊所就诊(28.04 至 36.75 岁)。不同国家的 EO 与 LO 易性癖成人数量存在差异(比利时、德国、荷兰、挪威)。
发病年龄对易性癖的发展具有鉴别价值,对 GIDC 标准的回顾性诊断似乎是一种有效的评估方法。欧洲国家之间存在发病年龄和性别比例的差异。