School of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Dame Margaret Barbour Building, Wallace Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK.
Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, Cambridge, UK.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):2077-2089. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02251-x. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
Previous research indicates a link between autism and transgender and gender-diverse identities, though the association is not yet fully understood. The current study examined autistic traits (Autism Spectrum Quotient [AQ]), empathizing (Empathizing Quotient-Short [EQ-S]), and systemizing (Systemizing Quotient-Short [SQ-S]) in a sample of 89 adults and aimed to test whether gender-diverse individuals exhibit cognitive profiles consistent with predictions derived from the Extreme Male Brain (EMB) theory. As most research has considered only cisgender people, we recruited a more diverse sample by contacting > 200 UK LGBTQ+ organizations and posting on social media. A range of non-cisgender identities (e.g., transgender male, transgender female, non-binary, genderqueer, transmasculine) and non-heterosexual orientations (e.g., bisexual) were represented, and participants were categorized into one of four groups: (1) assigned female at birth but does not identify as female (transgender AFAB) (n = 32), (2) cisgender female (n = 21), (3) assigned male at birth but does not identify as male (transgender AMAB) (n = 18), and (4) cisgender male (n = 18). After controlling for age and autism diagnostic status, transgender AFAB participants had marginally higher AQ scores, and significantly higher SQ-S and systemizing-relative-to-empathizing (D) scores, compared with the cisgender female group. No such differences were detected between the transgender AMAB and cisgender male groups. Our findings are broadly in line with predictions derived from the EMB theory, though as no transgender AFAB participants reported being heterosexual, it was not possible to determine whether these effects relate specifically to gender identity, to sexual orientation, or to both.
先前的研究表明自闭症与跨性别和性别多样化身份之间存在关联,尽管这种关联尚未得到充分理解。本研究在 89 名成年人样本中检查了自闭症特征(自闭症谱系商数 [AQ])、共情(共情商数短版 [EQ-S])和系统思维(系统思维商数短版 [SQ-S]),旨在测试性别多样化个体是否表现出与极端男性大脑(EMB)理论推导的预测相一致的认知特征。由于大多数研究只考虑了顺性别者,我们通过联系了 200 多个英国 LGBTQ+组织并在社交媒体上发布信息,招募了一个更加多样化的样本。研究代表了各种非顺性别身份(例如跨性别男性、跨性别女性、非二元性别、性别酷儿、跨男性气质)和非异性恋取向(例如双性恋),参与者被分为以下四组之一:(1)出生时被指定为女性但不认同女性身份(跨性别女性)(n=32),(2)顺性别女性(n=21),(3)出生时被指定为男性但不认同男性身份(跨性别男性)(n=18),和(4)顺性别男性(n=18)。在控制年龄和自闭症诊断状况后,跨性别女性组的 AQ 得分略高,SQ-S 得分和系统思维相对于共情(D)得分显著更高,与顺性别女性组相比。在跨性别男性组和顺性别男性组之间未检测到这种差异。我们的发现与 EMB 理论推导的预测大致相符,尽管由于没有跨性别女性组报告自己是异性恋者,因此无法确定这些影响是否具体与性别认同、性取向或两者都有关。