Salford Community Health, NHS Salford, Salford, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 Jan;19(1):60-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00949.x. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
This study is based on a formative evaluation of a case management service for high-intensity service users in Northern England. The evaluation had three main purposes: (i) to assess the quality of the organisational infrastructure; (ii) to obtain a better understanding of the key influences that played a role in shaping the development of the service; and (iii) to identify potential changes in practice that may help to improve the quality of service provision. The evaluation was informed by Gittell's relational co-ordination theory, which focuses upon cross-boundary working practices that facilitate task integration. The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Survey was used to assess the organisational infrastructure and qualitative interviews with front line staff were conducted to explore the key influences that shaped the development of the service. A high level of strategic commitment and political support for integrated working was identified. However, the quality of care co-ordination was variable. The most prominent operational factor that appeared to influence the scope and quality of care co-ordination was the pattern of interaction between the case managers and their co-workers. The co-ordination of patient care was much more effective in integrated co-ordination networks. Key features included clearly defined, task focussed, relational workspaces with interactive forums where case managers could engage with co-workers in discussions about the management of interdependent care activities. In dispersed co-ordination networks with fewer relational workspaces, the case managers struggled to work as effectively. The evaluation concluded that the creation of flexible and efficient task focused relational workspaces that are systemically managed and adequately resourced could help to improve the quality of care co-ordination, particularly in dispersed networks.
本研究基于对英格兰北部高强度服务使用者个案管理服务的形成性评估。该评估有三个主要目的:(i)评估组织基础设施的质量;(ii)更好地了解在服务发展中起作用的关键影响因素;(iii)确定可能有助于提高服务质量的潜在实践变化。评估以吉特尔的关系协调理论为依据,该理论侧重于促进任务整合的跨边界工作实践。使用慢性病护理评估调查来评估组织基础设施,并对一线工作人员进行定性访谈,以探讨影响服务发展的关键因素。确定了高水平的战略承诺和对综合工作的政治支持。然而,护理协调的质量是可变的。似乎影响护理协调的范围和质量的最突出的运营因素是个案经理与其同事之间的互动模式。在综合协调网络中,患者护理的协调更有效。关键特征包括明确界定的、以任务为中心的关系工作空间,以及互动论坛,个案经理可以在其中与同事讨论相互依存的护理活动的管理。在协调网络分散、关系工作空间较少的情况下,个案经理难以有效工作。评估结论认为,创建灵活高效的以任务为中心的关系工作空间,这些工作空间由系统管理并充分配备资源,可能有助于改善护理协调质量,特别是在分散的网络中。