University of the West of England, Gloucester, UK.
Nurs Philos. 2011 Jan;12(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00451.x.
Normative and prescriptive claims regarding social justice are often inadequately developed in the nursing literature and, in consequence, they must be rejected in their current form. Thus, claims regarding social justice are frequently presented as mere assertion (without clarification or supporting argument) or, alternatively, when assertions are supported that support may be weak (e.g. social justice is repeated juxtaposed against contentious assumptions regarding market disutility). This paper challenges the coherence of social justice as a shared nursing value and it is suggested that claims regarding the concept should be tempered.
规范性和规定性的社会正义主张在护理文献中常常不够完善，因此必须以目前的形式予以拒绝。因此，社会正义主张通常只是被提出（没有澄清或支持论据），或者，当支持的主张支持可能很薄弱（例如，社会正义被重复并置在关于市场不便利的有争议的假设中）。本文质疑社会正义作为共同护理价值观的一致性，并建议对该概念的主张进行适度处理。
