School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
Recognizing the international trend for patients to choose both allopathic western medicine (WM) and traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM), the World Health Organization has called for stronger collaboration between WM doctors (WMD) and TCAM practitioners. This resonates with the situation in Hong Kong where the dominant modality of patient care is primarily based on WM practice while traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is often used as a complement. The roots of this utilization pattern lie in colonial history when TCM was marginalised during the British administration. However since 1997 when China regained sovereignty, policies to regulate and professionalize TCM practices have been formally introduced. Despite both its popularity and this policy shift, progress on implementing collaboration between WM and TCM clinicians has been slow. This study, the first since 1997, explores current attitudes and referral behaviours of WMD towards use of TCM. We hypothesised that WMD would have positive attitudes towards TCM, due to regulation and cultural affinity, but that few actual TCM referrals would be made given the lack of a formal collaboration policy between elements within the healthcare system. Our results support these hypotheses, and this pattern possibly rooted from structural inhibitions originating from the historical dominance of WM and failure of services to respond to espoused policy. These have shaped Hong Kong's TCAM policy process to be closer with situations in the West, and have clearly differentiated it from integration experiences in other East Asian health systems where recent colonial history is absent. In addition, our results revealed that self use and formal education of TCM, rather than use of evidence in decision making, played a stronger role in determining referral. This implies that effective TCAM policies within WM dominated health systems like Hong Kong would require structural and educational solutions that foster both increased understanding and safe referrals.
认识到国际上患者同时选择对抗疗法(西医疗法)和传统、补充和替代医学(CAM)的趋势,世界卫生组织呼吁西医医生(WMD)与 CAM 从业者之间加强合作。这与香港的情况相呼应,香港的主要医疗模式主要基于西医疗法,而中医药(TCM)通常作为补充。这种利用模式的根源在于殖民历史,当时英国政府将 TCM 边缘化。然而,自 1997 年中国恢复主权以来,规范和专业化 TCM 实践的政策已正式出台。尽管 TCM 既受欢迎,政策也发生了转变,但 WM 和 TCM 临床医生之间合作的进展仍然缓慢。这项研究是自 1997 年以来的首次研究,探讨了 WMD 对 TCM 使用的当前态度和转介行为。我们假设由于监管和文化亲和力,WMD 对 TCM 的态度会是积极的,但由于医疗体系内部缺乏正式的合作政策,实际的 TCM 转介可能很少。我们的研究结果支持这些假设,这种模式可能源于 WM 历史主导地位和服务未能响应既定政策所带来的结构性抑制。这些因素塑造了香港的 CAM 政策进程,使其更接近西方的情况,并明确将其与其他东亚卫生系统的整合经验区分开来,因为这些系统中没有最近的殖民历史。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在决策中,自我使用和 TCM 的正规教育,而不是证据的使用,在决定转介方面发挥了更大的作用。这意味着在像香港这样的 WM 主导的医疗体系中,要实施有效的 CAM 政策,需要结构性和教育性的解决方案,以促进对 TCM 的深入理解和安全转介。