Department of Animal Biology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Neuroscience. 2011 Feb 23;175:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.12.006. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
The present study intended to investigate the involvement of dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems of the basolateral amygdala in amnesia induced by the stimulation of dorsal hippocampal cannabinoid receptors in male Wistar rats. The animals were stereotaxically implanted with guide cannulas in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus and basolateral amygdala (BLA), trained in a step-through type passive avoidance task, and tested 24 h after training to measure memory retrieval. Post-training intra-CA1 microinjection of the nonselective CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) (0.1-0.5 μg/rat) dose-dependently induced amnesia. Post-training intra-BLA administration of the D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (0.3 and 0.5 μg/rat) plus intra-CA1 administration of 0.1 μg/rat of WIN, which alone did not induce amnesia, inhibited memory formation. The inhibitory effect of 0.5 μg/rat of WIN (intra-CA1) on memory formation was significantly decreased by the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.1-0.5 μg/rat, intra-BLA) or the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride (0.02-0.5 μg/rat, intra-BLA) given 5 min before post-training intra-CA1 microinjection of WIN. It is important to note that single intra-BLA microinjection of the same doses of apomorphine, SCH23390 or sulpiride had no effect on memory retrieval in passive avoidance task. On the other hand, post-training co-administration of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 0.03 and 0.05 μg/rat, intra-BLA) plus an ineffective dose of WIN (0.1 μg/rat, intra-CA1) induced amnesia. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of 0.5 μg/rat of intra-CA1 microinjection of WIN on memory formation was significantly decreased by pre-treatment with intra-BLA microinjection of the NMDA receptor antagonist d-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (d-AP5; 0.1 and 0.5 μg/rat, intra-BLA). Intra-BLA microinjection of the same doses of NMDA or d-AP5 by itself did not induce any response on memory retrieval. Taken together, these findings support the existence of a functional interaction between dorsal hippocampal and basolateral amygdaloid neural circuits during processing cannabinoid-induced amnesia.
本研究旨在探讨外侧杏仁核多巴胺能和谷氨酸能系统在雄性 Wistar 大鼠背侧海马内大麻素受体刺激诱导的记忆障碍中的作用。动物被立体定位植入背侧海马 CA1 区和外侧杏仁核(BLA)的引导套管,在穿梭式被动回避任务中进行训练,并在训练后 24 小时进行测试,以测量记忆检索。背侧海马 CA1 区微注射非选择性 CB1/CB2 受体激动剂 WIN55,212-2(WIN)(0.1-0.5μg/大鼠)剂量依赖性地诱导记忆障碍。背侧海马 CA1 区微注射 0.1μg/大鼠的 WIN 后,BLA 内给予 D1/D2 多巴胺受体激动剂阿朴吗啡(0.3 和 0.5μg/大鼠),可抑制记忆形成。单独给予 0.1μg/大鼠的 WIN 不引起记忆障碍,但可抑制记忆形成。在背侧海马 CA1 区微注射 WIN(0.1μg/大鼠)前 5 分钟,BLA 内给予 D1 多巴胺受体拮抗剂 SCH23390(0.1-0.5μg/大鼠)或 D2 多巴胺受体拮抗剂舒必利(0.02-0.5μg/大鼠),可显著降低 WIN 对记忆形成的抑制作用。值得注意的是,单次 BLA 内微注射相同剂量的阿朴吗啡、SCH23390 或舒必利对被动回避任务中的记忆检索没有影响。另一方面,背侧海马 CA1 区微注射 NMDA(0.03 和 0.05μg/大鼠)联合无效剂量的 WIN(0.1μg/大鼠)可诱导记忆障碍。此外,BLA 内预先给予 NMDA 受体拮抗剂 d-2-氨基-5-磷戊酸(d-AP5;0.1 和 0.5μg/大鼠)可显著降低背侧海马 CA1 区微注射 0.5μg/大鼠 WIN 对记忆形成的抑制作用。BLA 内微注射相同剂量的 NMDA 或 d-AP5 本身不会引起记忆检索的任何反应。综上所述,这些发现支持在处理大麻素诱导的记忆障碍期间,背侧海马和外侧杏仁核神经回路之间存在功能相互作用。