• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低 CT 结肠成像中的口服对比剂剂量:粪便标记质量和患者接受度的评估。

Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2011 Jan;66(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.016
PMID:21147296
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the minimal iodine contrast medium load necessary for an optimal computed tomography colonography tagging quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Faecal occult blood test positive patients were randomly selected for one of three iodine bowel preparations: (1) 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (45 g iodine), (2) 4 × 25 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (30 g iodine); or (3) 3 × 25 ml (22.5 g iodine) meglumine ioxithalamate. Two experienced readers assessed the tagging quality per colonic segment on a five-point scale and the presence of adherent stool. Also semi-automatic homogeneity measurements were performed. Patient acceptance was assessed with questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 70 eligible patients, 45 patients participated (25 males, mean age 62 years). Each preparation group contained 15 patients. The quality of tagging was insufficient (score 1-2) in 0% of segments in group 1; 4% in group 2 (p<0.01 versus group 1); and 5% in group 3 (p=0.06 versus group 1). In group 1 in 11% of the segments adherent stool was present compared with 49% in group 2 and 41% in group 3 (p<0.01, group 2 and 3 versus group 1). Homogeneity was 85, 102 (p<0.01), and 91 SD HU (p=0.26) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In group 1 two patients experienced no burden after contrast agent ingestion compared to one patient in group 2 and nine patients in group 3 (p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

A dose of 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate is advisable for an optimal tagging quality despite beneficial effects on the patient acceptance in patients receiving a lower dose.

摘要

目的

评估用于最佳 CT 结肠成像标记质量的最小碘对比剂负荷。

材料和方法

粪便潜血试验阳性的患者被随机分为三组碘肠准备之一:(1)3×50ml 葡甲胺碘海醇(45g 碘),(2)4×25ml 葡甲胺碘海醇(30g 碘);或(3)3×25ml(22.5g 碘)葡甲胺碘海醇。两名经验丰富的读者按五分制评估每个结肠段的标记质量和附着粪便的存在。还进行了半自动均匀性测量。通过问卷调查评估患者的接受程度。

结果

70 名合格患者中有 45 名患者参加(25 名男性,平均年龄 62 岁)。每组各有 15 名患者。标记质量不足(评分 1-2)的节段在组 1中为 0%;在组 2中为 4%(p<0.01 与组 1相比);在组 3中为 5%(p=0.06 与组 1相比)。在组 1 中,11%的节段存在附着粪便,而在组 2 中为 49%,在组 3 中为 41%(p<0.01,组 2 和 3 与组 1 相比)。组 1、2 和 3 的均匀性分别为 85、102(p<0.01)和 91 SD HU(p=0.26)。在组 1 中,与组 2 中的 1 名患者和组 3 中的 9 名患者相比,有 2 名患者在摄入对比剂后没有负担(p=0.017)。

结论

尽管在接受较低剂量的患者中对患者接受度有有益影响,但 3×50ml 葡甲胺碘海醇的剂量是最佳标记质量的建议剂量。

相似文献

1
Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.降低 CT 结肠成像中的口服对比剂剂量:粪便标记质量和患者接受度的评估。
Clin Radiol. 2011 Jan;66(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
2
CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes.低渗肠道准备条件下 CT 结肠成像:两种碘基肠道准备方案的标签质量评估、患者接受度和诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1570-8. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
3
Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance.CT 结肠成像有限肠道准备中的低纤维饮食:对图像质量和患者接受度的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):W31-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3572.
4
CT colonography with rectal iodine tagging: Feasibility and comparison with oral tagging in a colorectal cancer screening population.直肠碘标记CT结肠成像:在结直肠癌筛查人群中的可行性及与口服标记的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.使用64排CT的全量泻药与最小量泻药粪便标记CT结肠成像:诊断性能、标记质量和患者接受度的前瞻性盲法比较
Acad Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(7):780-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.027. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
6
Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.CT 结肠成像中粪便标记质量的比较评估:钡剂与碘口服对比剂。
Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov;16(11):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
7
Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.两种 CT 结肠成像低准备方案的评估:优化图像质量和患者接受度。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1085-92. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22421731. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Three-day regimen improves faecal tagging for minimal preparation CT examination of the colon.三日方案可改善结肠最低限度准备CT检查的粪便标记。
Br J Radiol. 2009 Jul;82(979):545-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/82959871. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
9
Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.不同肠道准备方案及不同粪便标记剂对计算机断层结肠成像标记效果、患者依从性及诊断性能的比较研究:初步研究
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):657-65. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181926570.
10
Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.计算机断层结肠成像:泻药加钡剂标记与仅用碘化造影剂进行肠道准备和粪便标记的回顾性比较。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr;63(2):203-211. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12860. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
CT colonography: can we achieve an adequate bowel preparation without diet restriction?CT 结肠成像:不限制饮食能否达到充分的肠道准备?
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):5184-5192. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09471-w. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
2
Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.患者在随机试验中接受低剂量和全剂量肠道准备的 CT 结肠成像筛查的体验。
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
3
The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
成像技术作为结直肠癌筛查工具的潜力:一项成本效益分析。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150910. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150910. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography in patients with screen-detected 6-9 mm polyps.筛查发现6-9毫米息肉患者等待CT结肠造影监测的负担
Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):4000-4010. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4251-4. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial.在一项基于人群的筛查试验中,针对接受6 - 9毫米息肉监测的患者,计算机断层结肠造影术的参与情况及检出率
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2762-70. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4081-9. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology.3年监测期后经筛查发现的小(6 - 9毫米)息肉的演变:与组织病理学相比,CT结肠成像对息肉生长的评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;110(12):1682-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.340. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
A multi-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the value of a single bolus intravenous alfentanil in CT colonography.一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验,旨在评估单次静脉注射阿芬太尼在 CT 结肠成像中的价值。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 May 25;13:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-94.
8
Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview.虚拟结肠镜检查:效用、影响及概述。
World J Radiol. 2013 Mar 28;5(3):61-7. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.61.
9
Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.口服碘造影剂的可接受性:四种造影剂的头对头比较。
Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120636. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120636.
10
Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.聚乙二醇联合比沙可啶用于减轻肠道准备的疗效的初步研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):561-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.561.