Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134, Florence, Italy.
IFCA Hospital, Via del Pergolino 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
To assess patients' experience of bowel preparation and procedure for screening CT colonography with reduced (r-CTC) and full cathartic preparation (f-CTC) that showed similar detection rate for advanced neoplasia in a randomised trial.
Six hundred seventy-four subjects undergoing r-CTC and 612 undergoing f-CTC in the SAVE trial were asked to complete two pre-examination questionnaires-(1) Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) assessing optimism and (2) bowel preparation questionnaire-and a post-examination questionnaire evaluating overall experience of CTC screening test. Items were analysed with chi-square and t test separately and pooled.
LOT-R was completed by 529 (78%) of r-CTC and by 462 (75%) of f-CTC participants and bowel preparation questionnaire by 531 (79%) subjects in the r-CTC group and by 465 (76%) in the f-CTC group. Post-examination questionnaire was completed by 525 (78%) subjects in the r-CTC group and by 453 (74%) in the f-CTC group. LOT-R average score was not different between r-CTC (14.27 ± 3.66) and f-CTC (14.54 ± 3.35) (p = 0.22). In bowel preparation questionnaire, 88% of r-CTC subjects reported no preparation-related symptoms as compared to 70% of f-CTC subjects (p < 0.001). No interference of bowel preparation with daily activities was reported in 80% of subjects in the r-CTC group as compared to 53% of subjects in the f-CTC group (p < 0.001). In post-examination questionnaire, average scores for discomfort of the procedure were not significantly different between r-CTC (3.53 ± 0.04) and f-CTC (3.59 ± 0.04) groups (p = 0.84).
Reduced bowel preparation is better tolerated than full preparation for screening CT colonography.
• Reduced bowel preparation is better tolerated than full preparation for screening CT colonography. • Procedure-related discomfort of screening CT colonography is not influenced by bowel preparation. • Males tolerate bowel preparation and CT colonography screening procedure better than females.
评估在一项随机试验中,接受低渗(r-CTC)和全渗(f-CTC)肠道准备的筛查 CT 结肠成像患者的肠道准备和检查过程体验,这两种方法对高级肿瘤的检测率相似。
SAVE 试验中,674 名接受 r-CTC 检查和 612 名接受 f-CTC 检查的患者被要求完成两份检查前问卷-(1)生活取向测试修订版(LOT-R)评估乐观程度,(2)肠道准备问卷,并在完成 CT 结肠筛查测试后评估总体体验。使用卡方检验和 t 检验分别对项目进行分析,并进行汇总。
529 名(78%)r-CTC 组和 462 名(75%)f-CTC 组完成了 LOT-R,531 名(79%)r-CTC 组和 465 名(76%)f-CTC 组完成了肠道准备问卷。525 名(78%)r-CTC 组和 453 名(74%)f-CTC 组完成了检查后问卷。r-CTC(14.27±3.66)和 f-CTC(14.54±3.35)组的 LOT-R 平均分无差异(p=0.22)。在肠道准备问卷中,88%的 r-CTC 患者报告没有与准备相关的症状,而 f-CTC 患者只有 70%(p<0.001)。80%的 r-CTC 组患者报告肠道准备不影响日常活动,而 f-CTC 组只有 53%(p<0.001)。在检查后问卷中,r-CTC(3.53±0.04)和 f-CTC(3.59±0.04)组的程序相关不适评分无显著差异(p=0.84)。
筛查 CT 结肠成像的低渗肠道准备比全渗肠道准备更能被患者接受。
筛查 CT 结肠成像的低渗肠道准备比全渗肠道准备更能被患者接受。
肠道准备不影响 CT 结肠成像筛查过程的相关不适。
男性比女性更能耐受肠道准备和 CT 结肠成像筛查过程。