Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;45(7):589-95. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.078287. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
Poor frontal plane knee control has been shown to be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in ball/team sports. It is necessary to develop simple tests that can identify players with poor knee control and among other factors be able to optimise preventive training programmes. The present study investigated the correlation between a two-dimensional (2D) video analysis and subjective assessment performed by one physiotherapist in evaluating knee control. We also tested the correlation between three simple clinical tests using both methods. A cohort of 186 female elite team handball players completed three tests: single-leg squat (SLS), single-leg vertical drop jump (SLVDJ) and two-leg vertical drop jump (VDJ). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed good to excellent agreement between 2D video analysis and subjective assessment for SLS and VDJ (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.83-0.89), but not for SLVDJ (AUC 0.65-0.76). Poor knee control was detected in 25-40% of the players using SLS and VDJ. In contrast, poor knee control was identified in less than 1% of the subjects based on the SLVDJ test. This indicates that SLVDJ may be inadequate for evaluating poor frontal plane knee control. The correlation between the SLS and VDJ tests was found to be low, suggesting that these tests identified different subjects with poor knee control. These results indicate that subjective assessment can be used to screen for poor knee control and that both SLS and VDJ tests should be used in screening athletes for poor knee control.
膝关节在额状面控制不良已被证明是球类和团队运动中前交叉韧带损伤的一个风险因素。有必要开发简单的测试,以识别膝关节控制不良的运动员,并能优化预防训练计划。本研究调查了二维(2D)视频分析和一名物理治疗师进行的主观评估在评估膝关节控制方面的相关性。我们还使用两种方法测试了三个简单的临床测试之间的相关性。一组 186 名女性精英团队手球运动员完成了三项测试:单腿深蹲(SLS)、单腿垂直跳下落(SLVDJ)和双腿垂直跳下落(VDJ)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,2D 视频分析和 SLS 和 VDJ 的主观评估之间具有良好到极好的一致性(ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)0.83-0.89),但 SLVDJ 不一致(AUC 0.65-0.76)。使用 SLS 和 VDJ 检测到 25-40%的运动员存在膝关节控制不良。相比之下,根据 SLVDJ 测试,只有不到 1%的受试者被确定为膝关节控制不良。这表明 SLVDJ 可能不足以评估额状面膝关节控制不良。发现 SLS 和 VDJ 测试之间的相关性较低,表明这些测试确定了不同的膝关节控制不良的受试者。这些结果表明,主观评估可用于筛选膝关节控制不良,并且 SLS 和 VDJ 测试都应用于筛选膝关节控制不良的运动员。