• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非各省之间的医疗保健能力和分配:种族隔离结束后的基础设施不平等陷阱。

Health care capacity and allocations among South Africa's provinces: infrastructure-inequality traps after the end of apartheid.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Christ Church, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):165-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184895.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2009.184895
PMID:21148716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3000713/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the determinants of health care funding allocations among South Africa's provinces and their effects on health care from 1996 through 2007.

METHODS

We performed multivariate regression of funding allocation data against measures of disease burden and health system infrastructure by province.

RESULTS

Disease burden was increasingly negatively correlated with funding allocations and explained less than one quarter of the variation in allocations among provinces. Nearly three quarters of the variation in allocations was explained by preexisting hospital infrastructure and health care workers. The density of private hospitals in the preceding year was associated with greater government allocations (b(private) = 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08, 0.15), but public hospital density in the preceding year was not (b(public) = 0.05; 95% CI = -0.02, 0.11). Greater allocations were associated with a higher number of doctors (b = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.75) but fewer nurses (b = -0.37; 95% CI = -0.72,-0.25) in the same year.

CONCLUSIONS

Regions with a greater capacity to spend funds received more funding and created more infrastructure than those with greater health needs. Historical infrastructure inequalities may have created an infrastructure-inequality trap, in which the distribution of funds to those with greater "absorptive capacity" exacerbates inequalities.

摘要

目的

我们评估了南非各省之间医疗保健资金分配的决定因素及其对 1996 年至 2007 年期间医疗保健的影响。

方法

我们对资金分配数据与各省疾病负担和卫生系统基础设施指标进行了多元回归分析。

结果

疾病负担与资金分配呈负相关,且解释了各省之间资金分配差异的不到四分之一。资金分配差异的近四分之三是由先前存在的医院基础设施和卫生保健工作者解释的。前一年私立医院的密度与政府拨款的增加有关(b(private) = 0.12;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.08,0.15),但前一年公立医院密度无显著相关(b(public) = 0.05;95% CI = -0.02,0.11)。当年拨款较多与医生人数较多(b = 0.54;95% CI = 0.34,0.75)相关,但护士人数较少(b = -0.37;95% CI = -0.72,-0.25)。

结论

有更多资金支出能力的地区比有更大卫生需求的地区获得了更多的资金并建立了更多的基础设施。历史基础设施不平等可能造成了基础设施不平等陷阱,即向具有更大“吸收能力”的地区分配资金加剧了不平等。

相似文献

1
Health care capacity and allocations among South Africa's provinces: infrastructure-inequality traps after the end of apartheid.南非各省之间的医疗保健能力和分配:种族隔离结束后的基础设施不平等陷阱。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):165-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184895.
2
Bridging the health inequality gap: an examination of South Africa's social innovation in health landscape.弥合健康不平等差距:南非健康领域社会创新的考察。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Mar 1;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00804-9.
3
Explaining the role of the social determinants of health on health inequality in South Africa.解释南非健康的社会决定因素对健康不平等的作用。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 16;8:28865. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28865. eCollection 2015.
4
Health and social policies in the new South Africa.新南非的健康与社会政策。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(4):727-43. doi: 10.2190/YJU7-0HDM-7TYW-XLMF.
5
Protecting resources for primary health care under fiscal federalism: options for resource allocation.财政联邦制下初级卫生保健资源的保护:资源分配方案
Health Policy Plan. 2007 Nov;22(6):415-26. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm032.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis and policy choices: investing in health systems.成本效益分析与政策选择:对卫生系统的投资
Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(4):663-74.
7
Establishing a health promotion and development foundation in South Africa.在南非建立一个健康促进和发展基金会。
S Afr Med J. 2013 Jan 14;103(3):147-9. doi: 10.7196/samj.6281.
8
Health and development: some concerns about South Africa's health policy.健康与发展:对南非卫生政策的一些担忧。
Urban Health Newsl. 1996 Sep(30):33-48.
9
Can medical scheme reform lead to fairer distribution of limited resources? A funding perspective.医疗计划改革能否带来有限资源更公平的分配?从资金角度分析。
S Afr Med J. 2005 Mar;95(3):175-9.
10
Challenges in defining an optimal approach to formula-based allocations of public health funds in the United States.在美国,确定基于公式的公共卫生资金分配最佳方法面临的挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Mar 29;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing changes in non-alcoholic sugary beverage prices in Agincourt following South Africa's Health Promotion Levy: A pre- and post-implementation study.南非健康促进税实施后阿金库尔非酒精含糖饮料价格变化评估:一项实施前后研究
J Public Health Res. 2025 Sep 12;14(3):22799036251358299. doi: 10.1177/22799036251358299. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Between support and scepticism: Health professionals' perceptions of a nutrition education program promoting low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets in under-resourced South African communities.在支持与怀疑之间:卫生专业人员对一项在资源匮乏的南非社区推广低碳水化合物、高脂肪饮食的营养教育项目的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0325179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325179. eCollection 2025.
3
Inequality in infrastructure access and its association with health disparities.基础设施获取方面的不平等及其与健康差距的关联。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02208-3.
4
Assessing patients' experience of care in four referral hospitals: a cross-sectional survey of outpatients in two South African rural provinces.评估四家转诊医院的患者护理体验:对南非两个农村省份门诊患者的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12002-y.
5
'We are working in specialty units'-An exploratory qualitative study.“我们在专科单位工作”——一项探索性定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70041. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70041.
6
Exploring Health Research Priority Setting in a South African Province: A Nominal Group Technique Approach.探索南非某省的卫生研究优先事项设定:名义群体技术方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 30;21(7):861. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070861.
7
Adaptation and feasibility of WHO PM+ for adolescents living with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa: an implementation feasibility study protocol.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省艾滋病毒感染者青少年使用世界卫生组织 PM+的适应性和可行性:一项实施可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e088992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088992.
8
Effectiveness of Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults during COVID-19 across Districts with Different Healthcare Resource: A Case Study of Keelung City in Taiwan.不同医疗资源地区老年人在 COVID-19 期间体育活动计划的有效性:以台湾基隆市为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;12(12):1177. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121177.
9
Sociopolitical Diagnostic Tools to Understand National and Local Response Capabilities and Vulnerabilities to Epidemics and Guide Research into How to Improve the Global Response to Pathogens.社会政治诊断工具,用于了解国家和地方对流行病的应对能力及脆弱性,并指导关于如何改善全球病原体应对措施的研究。
Pathogens. 2023 Aug 8;12(8):1023. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081023.
10
Implementing an intervention to improve leadership/management of public healthcare services in the Free State Province, South Africa: lessons learned.在南非自由州省实施一项干预措施,以改善公共医疗服务的领导力/管理:经验教训。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):469-482. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.49.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving the health Millennium Development Goals for South Africa: challenges and priorities.实现南非的卫生千年发展目标:挑战与优先事项。
Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):1023-1031. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61122-3. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
2
The health and health system of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges.南非的健康与卫生系统:当前公共卫生挑战的历史根源
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):817-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60951-X. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
3
Implications of mortality transition for primary health care in rural South Africa: a population-based surveillance study.南非农村地区死亡率转变对初级卫生保健的影响:一项基于人群的监测研究。
Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):893-901. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61399-9.
4
The interface between research and policy: experience from South Africa.研究与政策之间的界面:来自南非的经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(5):748-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
5
Post-apartheid challenges: household access and use of health care in South Africa.后种族隔离时代的挑战:南非家庭获得和使用医疗保健服务的情况
Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(4):673-91. doi: 10.2190/HS.37.4.f.
6
A cross-sectional study of vascular risk factors in a rural South African population: data from the Southern African Stroke Prevention Initiative (SASPI).南非农村人口血管危险因素的横断面研究:来自南部非洲中风预防倡议(SASPI)的数据。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 13;7:326. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-326.
7
A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count by counting everyone.一场隐形的丑闻:通过统计每一个人来让每个人都被纳入考量。
Lancet. 2007 Nov 3;370(9598):1569-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61307-5.
8
Estimation of mortality from vital registrations in South Africa.南非基于人口动态登记数据的死亡率估算。
Curr HIV Res. 2006 Oct;4(4):469-74. doi: 10.2174/157016206778560054.
9
Key challenges to achieving health for all in an inequitable society: the case of South Africa.在一个不平等的社会中实现全民健康面临的关键挑战:以南非为例。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jan;96(1):73-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062679. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
10
Actor management in the development of health financing reform: health insurance in South Africa, 1994-1999.卫生筹资改革发展中的行为者管理:1994 - 1999年南非的医疗保险
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):279-91. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh033.