Dare Chengetai, Canning David, Boachie Micheal Kofi, Herl Carlos Riumallo, Goldstein Susan, Thsehla Evelyn, Hofman Karen
SAMR/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - PRICELESS SA, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Public Health Res. 2025 Sep 12;14(3):22799036251358299. doi: 10.1177/22799036251358299. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) effectively reduces consumption when it leads to increased consumer prices and demand is sufficiently responsive, alongside other factors. Given the significant disparities in health outcomes between urban and rural provinces, this study to seeks to measure the changes in the prices of SSBs in rural South Africa and estimate the extent of the tax passthrough following the introduction of the Health Promotion Levy (HPL).
We employed pre-post regression analyses techniques using the 2023 HAALSI Nutritional Establishment survey data.
The results show that the HPL led to an increase in prices (in real terms), and the price increase was more than that of the HPL. On average, the price of carbonated beverages increased by ZAR2.24 per litre (95% CI: 1.65-2.83) post the introduction of the HPL. However, the price increase was only registered during the period the HPL was introduced. The tax passthrough for carbonates was estimated at 1.87, implying that the tax was overshifted to consumers.
This study shows that introduction of the HPL led to an increase in prices of carbonated beverages in Agincourt. The value of the HPL was however eroded over time by inflation. Considering that the effective tax burden of the HPL is substantially below the 20% minimum threshold recommended by the World Health Organisation, it is important that the government raises the HPL to maintain its value. Increasing the HPL is important to incentivise people to reduce SSB consumption.
对含糖饮料(SSB)征税在导致消费者价格上涨且需求具有足够响应性以及其他因素的情况下,能有效减少消费。鉴于城乡省份在健康结果方面存在显著差异,本研究旨在衡量南非农村地区含糖饮料价格的变化,并估计引入健康促进税(HPL)后的税收转嫁程度。
我们使用2023年HAALSI营养机构调查数据,采用前后回归分析技术。
结果表明,健康促进税导致价格(实际)上涨,且价格上涨幅度超过了健康促进税。平均而言,引入健康促进税后,碳酸饮料价格每升上涨2.24兰特(95%置信区间:1.65 - 2.83)。然而,价格上涨仅在引入健康促进税期间出现。碳酸饮料的税收转嫁估计为1.87,这意味着税收过度转嫁给了消费者。
本研究表明,引入健康促进税导致阿金库尔的碳酸饮料价格上涨。然而,健康促进税的价值随着时间推移因通货膨胀而被侵蚀。鉴于健康促进税的有效税负大幅低于世界卫生组织建议的20%最低门槛,政府提高健康促进税以维持其价值很重要。提高健康促进税对于激励人们减少含糖饮料消费很重要。