Nolte Guido, Müller Klaus-Robert
Intelligent Data Analysis Group, Fraunhofer FIRST Berlin, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 22;4:209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00209. eCollection 2010.
Estimating brain connectivity and especially causality between different brain regions from EEG or MEG is limited by the fact that the data are a largely unknown superposition of the actual brain activities. Any method, which is not robust to mixing artifacts, is prone to yield false positive results. We here review a number of methods that allow for addressing this problem. They are all based on the insight that the imaginary part of the cross-spectra cannot be explained as a mixing artifact. First, a joined decomposition of these imaginary parts into pairwise activities separates subsystems containing different rhythmic activities. Second, assuming that the respective source estimates are least overlapping, yields a separation of the rhythmic interacting subsystem into the source topographies themselves. Finally, a causal relation between these sources can be estimated using the newly proposed measure Phase Slope Index (PSI). This work, for the first time, presents the above methods in combination; all illustrated using a single, simulated data set.
从脑电图(EEG)或脑磁图(MEG)估计大脑连接性,尤其是不同脑区之间的因果关系,受到数据是实际大脑活动的很大程度上未知叠加这一事实的限制。任何对混合伪迹不稳健的方法都容易产生假阳性结果。我们在此回顾一些能够解决这个问题的方法。它们都基于这样一种见解,即互谱的虚部不能解释为混合伪迹。首先,将这些虚部联合分解为成对活动,可分离出包含不同节律活动的子系统。其次,假设各自的源估计最少重叠,可将节律相互作用子系统分离为源地形图本身。最后,可以使用新提出的相位斜率指数(PSI)来估计这些源之间的因果关系。这项工作首次将上述方法结合起来展示;所有方法都使用单个模拟数据集进行说明。