• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定位和估计相互作用的脑节律的因果关系。

Localizing and estimating causal relations of interacting brain rhythms.

作者信息

Nolte Guido, Müller Klaus-Robert

机构信息

Intelligent Data Analysis Group, Fraunhofer FIRST Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 22;4:209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00209. eCollection 2010.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00209
PMID:21151369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2996143/
Abstract

Estimating brain connectivity and especially causality between different brain regions from EEG or MEG is limited by the fact that the data are a largely unknown superposition of the actual brain activities. Any method, which is not robust to mixing artifacts, is prone to yield false positive results. We here review a number of methods that allow for addressing this problem. They are all based on the insight that the imaginary part of the cross-spectra cannot be explained as a mixing artifact. First, a joined decomposition of these imaginary parts into pairwise activities separates subsystems containing different rhythmic activities. Second, assuming that the respective source estimates are least overlapping, yields a separation of the rhythmic interacting subsystem into the source topographies themselves. Finally, a causal relation between these sources can be estimated using the newly proposed measure Phase Slope Index (PSI). This work, for the first time, presents the above methods in combination; all illustrated using a single, simulated data set.

摘要

从脑电图(EEG)或脑磁图(MEG)估计大脑连接性,尤其是不同脑区之间的因果关系,受到数据是实际大脑活动的很大程度上未知叠加这一事实的限制。任何对混合伪迹不稳健的方法都容易产生假阳性结果。我们在此回顾一些能够解决这个问题的方法。它们都基于这样一种见解,即互谱的虚部不能解释为混合伪迹。首先,将这些虚部联合分解为成对活动,可分离出包含不同节律活动的子系统。其次,假设各自的源估计最少重叠,可将节律相互作用子系统分离为源地形图本身。最后,可以使用新提出的相位斜率指数(PSI)来估计这些源之间的因果关系。这项工作首次将上述方法结合起来展示;所有方法都使用单个模拟数据集进行说明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/d1bab4f721a4/fnhum-04-00209-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/7315629a789f/fnhum-04-00209-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/6d1aac5b7244/fnhum-04-00209-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/7a4043a335bb/fnhum-04-00209-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/002d371d8ca6/fnhum-04-00209-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/d1bab4f721a4/fnhum-04-00209-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/7315629a789f/fnhum-04-00209-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/6d1aac5b7244/fnhum-04-00209-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/7a4043a335bb/fnhum-04-00209-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/002d371d8ca6/fnhum-04-00209-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed1/2996143/d1bab4f721a4/fnhum-04-00209-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Localizing and estimating causal relations of interacting brain rhythms.定位和估计相互作用的脑节律的因果关系。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 22;4:209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00209. eCollection 2010.
2
Bispectral pairwise interacting source analysis for identifying systems of cross-frequency interacting brain sources from electroencephalographic or magnetoencephalographic signals.基于双谱互信息的源分析方法识别脑电或脑磁信号中跨频相互作用的脑源系统
Phys Rev E. 2016 May;93(5):052420. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.052420. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Localizing brain interactions from rhythmic EEG/MEG data.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:998-1001. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403330.
4
Identifying causal networks of neuronal sources from EEG/MEG data with the phase slope index: a simulation study.使用相位斜率指数从脑电图/脑磁图数据中识别神经元源的因果网络:一项模拟研究。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2013 Apr;58(2):165-78. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0028.
5
Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.超边捆绑:一种解决脑磁图/脑电图源连接分析中虚假相互作用的实用方法。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:610-622. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.056. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency.利用相干性的虚部从脑电图数据中识别真正的脑内相互作用。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2292-307. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029.
7
Disclosing large-scale directed functional connections in MEG with the multivariate phase slope index.用多元相位斜率指数揭示脑磁图中的大规模定向功能连接。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space.从 EEG/MEG 数据中估计真正的大脑连接,该数据在传感器空间中对线性和静态变换具有不变性。
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):476-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.084. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
9
Wedge MUSIC: a novel approach to examine experimental differences of brain source connectivity patterns from EEG/MEG data.楔子 MUSIC:一种从 EEG/MEG 数据中检查脑源连接模式实验差异的新方法。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:610-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
10
A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study.对 EEG 数据连通性测量的批判性评估:一项模拟研究。
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:120-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.036. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Contributions of Magnetoencephalography to Understanding Mechanisms of Generalized Epilepsies: Blurring the Boundary Between Focal and Generalized Epilepsies?脑磁图在理解全身性癫痫机制中的作用:模糊局灶性癫痫与全身性癫痫之间的界限?
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 27;13:831546. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831546. eCollection 2022.
2
Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.预备δ波相位反应与自然语言理解能力相关。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Apr;16(2):337-352. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09711-z. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
3
Interhemispheric connectivity during lateralized lexical decision.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding stationary subspaces in multivariate time series.多元时间序列中的平稳子空间发现。
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Nov 20;103(21):214101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.214101.
2
Minimum Overlap Component Analysis (MOCA) of EEG/MEG data for more than two sources.用于两个以上源的脑电图/脑磁图数据的最小重叠成分分析(MOCA)
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Sep 30;183(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Direct electrophysiological measurement of human default network areas.人类默认网络区域的直接电生理测量。
大脑两半球在侧化词汇判断过程中的连接
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Feb 15;40(3):818-832. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24414. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Extremely preterm children exhibit increased interhemispheric connectivity for language: findings from fMRI-constrained MEG analysis.极早产儿的大脑半球间语言连接增强:基于 fMRI 约束的 MEG 分析的发现。
Dev Sci. 2018 Nov;21(6):e12669. doi: 10.1111/desc.12669. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Granger Causality Analysis of Interictal iEEG Predicts Seizure Focus and Ultimate Resection.脑电信号中的棘波发作间期的格兰杰因果分析预测致痫灶和最终切除范围。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):99-109. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx195.
6
Multi-Dimensional Dynamics of Human Electromagnetic Brain Activity.人类电磁脑活动的多维动力学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 19;9:713. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00713. eCollection 2015.
7
Characterizing Information Flux Within the Distributed Pediatric Expressive Language Network: A Core Region Mapped Through fMRI-Constrained MEG Effective Connectivity Analyses.描绘分布式小儿表达性语言网络中的信息流:通过功能磁共振成像约束的脑磁图有效连接分析绘制的核心区域。
Brain Connect. 2016 Feb;6(1):76-83. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0374. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
8
Thalamocortical interactions underlying visual fear conditioning in humans.人类视觉恐惧条件反射背后的丘脑皮质相互作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4592-603. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22940. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
Brain networks supporting perceptual grouping and contour selection.支持知觉分组和轮廓选择的大脑网络。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 4;5:264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00264. eCollection 2014.
10
To perceive or not perceive: the role of gamma-band activity in signaling object percepts.感知或不感知:伽马波段活动在信号对象感知中的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e66363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066363. Print 2013.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12174-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902071106. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
4
Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity.整体大于部分之和:结合结构连接性与静息态功能连接性的研究综述
Brain Struct Funct. 2009 Oct;213(6):525-33. doi: 10.1007/s00429-009-0208-6. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation.神经元γ波段同步作为皮层计算中的一个基本过程。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:209-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603.
6
Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems.可靠地估计复杂物理系统中信息的流动方向。
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jun 13;100(23):234101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.234101. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
7
Understanding brain connectivity from EEG data by identifying systems composed of interacting sources.通过识别由相互作用源组成的系统,从脑电图(EEG)数据中理解大脑连接性。
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.250. Epub 2008 May 6.
8
Unrest at rest: default activity and spontaneous network correlations.静息时的不安:默认活动与自发网络相关性
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1091-6; discussion 1097-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Neuronal coherence during selective attentional processing and sensory-motor integration.选择性注意力处理和感觉运动整合过程中的神经元相干性。
J Physiol Paris. 2006 Oct;100(4):182-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
10
Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.相位滞后指数:从多通道脑电图和脑磁图评估功能连接性,减少来自共同源的偏差。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1178-93. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20346.