Carp Joshua, Gmeindl Leon, Reuter-Lorenz Patricia A
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 22;4:217. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00217. eCollection 2010.
Working memory function declines across the lifespan. Computational models of aging attribute such memory impairments to reduced distinctiveness between neural representations of different mental states in old age, a phenomenon termed dedifferentiation. These models predict that neural distinctiveness should be reduced uniformly across experimental conditions in older adults. In contrast, the Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis (CRUNCH) model predicts that the distinctiveness of neural representations should be increased in older adults (relative to young adults) at low levels of task demand but reduced at high levels of demand. The present study used multi-voxel pattern analysis to measure the effects of age and task demands on the distinctiveness of the neural representations of verbal and visuospatial working memory. Neural distinctiveness was estimated separately for memory encoding, maintenance, and retrieval, and for low, medium, and high memory loads. Results from sensory cortex during encoding and retrieval were consistent with the dedifferentiation hypothesis: distinctiveness of visual cortical representations during these phases was uniformly reduced in older adults, irrespective of memory load. However, maintenance-related responses in prefrontal and parietal regions yielded a strikingly different pattern of results. At low loads, older adults showed higher distinctiveness than younger adults; at high loads, this pattern reversed, such that distinctiveness was higher in young adults. This interaction between age group and memory load is at odds with the dedifferentiation hypothesis but consistent with CRUNCH. In sum, our results provide partial support for both dedifferentiation- and compensation-based models; we argue that comprehensive theories of cognitive aging must incorporate aspects of both models to fully explain complex patterns of age-related neuro-cognitive change.
工作记忆功能在整个生命周期中都会衰退。衰老的计算模型将这种记忆损伤归因于老年人不同心理状态的神经表征之间的差异减少,这一现象被称为去分化。这些模型预测,老年人在各种实验条件下神经差异都应均匀减少。相比之下,神经回路补偿相关利用假说(CRUNCH)模型预测,在低任务需求水平下,老年人(相对于年轻人)神经表征的差异应增加,但在高需求水平下则会减少。本研究使用多体素模式分析来测量年龄和任务需求对言语和视觉空间工作记忆神经表征差异的影响。分别针对记忆编码、维持和检索,以及低、中、高记忆负荷来估计神经差异。编码和检索过程中感觉皮层的结果与去分化假说一致:在这些阶段,老年人视觉皮层表征的差异无论记忆负荷如何都均匀减少。然而,前额叶和顶叶区域与维持相关的反应产生了截然不同的结果模式。在低负荷下,老年人比年轻人表现出更高的差异;在高负荷下,这种模式发生逆转,年轻人的差异更高。年龄组和记忆负荷之间的这种相互作用与去分化假说不一致,但与CRUNCH假说一致。总之,我们的结果为基于去分化和补偿的模型都提供了部分支持;我们认为,认知衰老的综合理论必须纳入这两种模型的各个方面,以充分解释与年龄相关的复杂神经认知变化模式。