Psychiatric Research Centre, School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Örebro.
Int J Womens Health. 2010 Oct 28;2:375-9. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S12349.
The aim of this study was to examine longitudinally the role of characteristics measured by the Eating Disorder Inventory-Child version (EDI-C) to find early predictors that might constitute risk and protective factors in the development of disordered eating.
Participants were divided into three groups based on eating attitudes at T2: disordered eating (n = 49), intermediate eating concern (n = 260), and healthy eating attitudes (n = 120). EDI-C from T1 (four to five years earlier) was then analyzed to find predictors of group classification at T2.
Drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction emerged as risk factors at T1, while drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and interoceptive awareness emerged as protective factors after controlling for initial eating concerns and body mass index.
Eating disorders should not be seen as a result of a premorbid personality type. Rather we should take a more social-psychological perspective to explain how individual and sociocultural factors work together in the development of these conditions.
本研究旨在纵向研究饮食障碍量表儿童版(EDI-C)测量的特征在发展障碍性进食中扮演的角色,寻找可能构成风险和保护因素的早期预测因子。
根据 T2 时的饮食态度,参与者被分为三组:饮食障碍组(n=49)、中间饮食关注组(n=260)和健康饮食态度组(n=120)。然后分析 T1 时的 EDI-C,以寻找 T2 时分组的预测因子。
在 T1 时,消瘦驱动和身体不满成为风险因素,而在控制初始饮食关注和体重指数后,消瘦驱动、身体不满和内部感知意识成为保护因素。
不应该将饮食障碍视为一种潜在的人格类型的结果。相反,我们应该从更社会心理学的角度来解释个体和社会文化因素如何共同作用于这些疾病的发展。