• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的评分者间一致性研究。

Inter-rater concordance study of the PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index).

作者信息

Faria Joana Ribeiro Costa de, Aarão Aline Rezende, Jimenez Luiz Miguel Zabaleta, Silva Oscar Hernández, Avelleira João Carlos Regazzi

机构信息

Instituto de Dermatologia Prof. Rubem David Azulay, Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

An Bras Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;85(5):625-9. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962010000500005.

DOI:10.1590/s0365-05962010000500005
PMID:21152786
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developed in 1978, the PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) is a method to rate psoriasis severity. Since then, it has been criticized for being extremely long, complex and for yielding significantly divergent interpretations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the PASI inter-rater reliability among three independent evaluators examining the same patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in 2007 at a psoriasis treatment center, where 20 patients were selected. The patients were evaluated by three postgraduate students of Dermatology who independently determined the PASI of each patient. The inter-rater reliability coefficient was determined by employing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland & Altman plots.

RESULTS

An ICC of 0.729 (IC 95%: 0.440 - 0.882) showed a significant degree of concordance among evaluators. By graphic means, the Bland & Altman plot method presents concordance gap ranges. As shown in this study, narrow gap ranges indicate a good concordance degree. It was also observed that for high PASI values, wider concordance gap ranges predominate.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, we may conclude that the PASI is a reliable indicator of psoriasis severity because it shows significant concordance when independent evaluations are performed.

摘要

背景

银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)于1978年制定,是一种评估银屑病严重程度的方法。从那时起,它就因极其冗长、复杂且产生的解释差异很大而受到批评。

目的

确定在对同一患者进行检查的三位独立评估者之间PASI的评分者间信度。

方法

2007年在一家银屑病治疗中心进行横断面研究,选取20例患者。由三名皮肤科研究生对患者进行评估,他们独立确定每位患者的PASI。评分者间信度系数通过组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼图来确定。

结果

ICC为0.729(95%置信区间:0.440 - 0.882),表明评估者之间存在显著程度的一致性。通过图形方法,布兰德-奥特曼图法呈现出一致性差距范围。如本研究所示,较窄的差距范围表明一致性程度良好。还观察到,对于较高的PASI值,一致性差距范围更宽。

结论

基于此分析,我们可以得出结论,PASI是银屑病严重程度的可靠指标,因为在进行独立评估时它显示出显著的一致性。

相似文献

1
Inter-rater concordance study of the PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index).银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的评分者间一致性研究。
An Bras Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;85(5):625-9. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962010000500005.
2
Inter-observer reliability of the PASI in a clinical setting.临床环境中银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的观察者间可靠性。
Australas J Dermatol. 2015 May;56(2):100-2. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12280. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
3
A study examining inter-rater and intrarater reliability of a novel instrument for assessment of psoriasis: the Copenhagen Psoriasis Severity Index.一项关于一种评估银屑病的新型工具——哥本哈根银屑病严重程度指数的评分者间和评分者内信度的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Aug;159(2):407-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08680.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
4
A study examining inter- and intrarater reliability of three scales for measuring severity of psoriasis: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment.一项关于三种测量银屑病严重程度量表的评分者间及评分者内信度的研究:银屑病面积和严重程度指数、医生整体评估以及点阵系统医生整体评估。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Oct;155(4):707-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07389.x.
5
The reliability of three psoriasis assessment tools: Psoriasis area and severity index, body surface area and physician global assessment.三种银屑病评估工具的可靠性:银屑病面积和严重程度指数、体表面积和医师整体评估。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Aug;26(5):851-856. doi: 10.17219/acem/69804.
6
Why statistics matter: limited inter-rater agreement prevents using the psoriasis area and severity index as a unique determinant of therapeutic decision in psoriasis.统计学为何重要:在银屑病中,由于观察者间一致性有限,不能将银屑病面积和严重程度指数作为治疗决策的唯一决定因素。
J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Sep;132(9):2171-5. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.124. Epub 2012 May 17.
7
The self-administered psoriasis area and severity index is valid and reliable.自我管理的银屑病面积和严重程度指数是有效且可靠的。
J Invest Dermatol. 1996 Jan;106(1):183-6. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12329912.
8
A pilot study on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for small areas: Presentation and implications of the Low PASI score.
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26(4):314-7. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2014.972316. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
9
Precision and reproducibility of automated computer-guided Psoriasis Area and Severity Index measurements in comparison with trained physicians.自动化计算机引导的银屑病面积和严重程度指数测量与经过培训的医生相比的精确性和可重复性。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;180(2):390-396. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17200. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
10
Performance of the self-administered psoriasis area and severity index in evaluating clinical and sociodemographic subgroups of patients with psoriasis.自我管理的银屑病面积和严重程度指数在评估银屑病患者临床和社会人口统计学亚组中的表现。
Arch Dermatol. 2003 Mar;139(3):353-8; discussion 357. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.3.353.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of Psoriasis Disability Index and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index: A Study from Afghanistan.银屑病残疾指数与银屑病面积和严重程度指数的相关性:一项来自阿富汗的研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Apr 5;15:559-566. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S363343. eCollection 2022.
2
Systemic glucocorticoid use and the occurrence of flares in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a systematic review.系统糖皮质激素使用与银屑病关节炎和银屑病发作的关系:系统评价。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Nov 2;61(11):4232-4244. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac129.
3
Applicability of the Geographic Tongue Area and Severity Index among Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Validation of a Newly Developed Geographic Tongue Scoring System.
口腔黏膜地图舌面积及严重程度指数在医疗保健专业人员中的适用性:一种新开发的口腔黏膜地图舌评分系统的横断面临床验证
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 24;10(23):5493. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235493.
4
Morphological Characteristics of Psoriatic Lesions Affect the Accuracy and Reliability of Severity Assessments: Proposal for New Working Criteria for the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index.银屑病皮损的形态学特征影响严重程度评估的准确性和可靠性:银屑病面积和严重程度指数新工作标准的提议
Ann Dermatol. 2019 Feb;31(1):81-83. doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.1.81. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Serum TSLP is a potential biomarker of psoriasis vulgaris activity.血清胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素是寻常型银屑病活动度的潜在生物标志物。
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2019 Jul 30;9:59-63. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S212774. eCollection 2019.
6
Both Educational Lectures and Reference Photographs Are Necessary to Improve the Accuracy and Reliability of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Assessment: Results from Korean Nation-Wide PASI Educational Workshop.教育讲座和参考照片对于提高银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)评估的准确性和可靠性均必不可少:韩国全国性PASI教育研讨会的结果
Ann Dermatol. 2018 Jun;30(3):284-289. doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.3.284. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
Efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with psoriatic arthritis: protocol for a 6-month, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.粪便微生物群移植治疗银屑病关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期6个月的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 27;8(4):e019231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019231.
8
Quantitative Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: First-In-Human Pilot Study in Patients with Liver Metastases.定量三维动态对比增强超声成像:肝转移患者的首例人体初步研究。
Theranostics. 2017 Aug 23;7(15):3745-3758. doi: 10.7150/thno.20329. eCollection 2017.
9
Development of the Adult Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Severity Scale-A Delphi Consensus Exercise for Item Generation.成人外阴硬化性苔藓严重程度量表的制定——德尔菲共识意见项目生成。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018 Jan;22(1):66-73. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000361.
10
Assessing practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Discrepancy between standard visual evaluation and a mechanical feedback device.评估心肺复苏中的实践技能:标准视觉评估与机械反馈装置之间的差异。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6515. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006515.